Joey Barton faces new trial over assault allegation

Joey Barton was manager of Bristol Rovers at the time of the alleged assault

Former footballer Joey Barton faces a new criminal trial over an allegation he assaulted his wife, judges at the High Court have ruled.

Barton was accused of assaulting Georgia Barton in a drunken row outside their home in Kew, south-west London, in June 2021, which he denied.

He was due to face trial at a magistrates' court in 2022 however the case was adjourned after Mrs Barton retracted her allegations.

In a judgment on Friday, two senior judges said Barton should face a trial over the allegations in front of a different judge.

'Fair trial'

After the case was adjourned, a judge ordered that proceedings be paused over concerns a trial would be unfair to Barton as prosecutors said they did not plan to ask Mrs Barton to give evidence in court.

The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), Stephen Parkinson, appealed against the decision at the High Court in London, with barristers claiming at a hearing last month that a fair trial could go ahead.

On Friday two senior judges ruled in the DPP's favour.

In a 20-page ruling, Dame Victoria Sharp said the previous judge's decision "was wrong in principle".

Barton, who was Bristol Rovers' manager at the time of the alleged incident, was accused of grabbing his wife by the throat and kicking her in the head during a row outside their home, where they had been with two other couples.

He denied a charge of assault by beating after he was arrested by police at his home.

Mrs Barton was said to have been left with a golf ball-sized bruise on her forehead and a bleeding nose.

But Wimbledon Magistrates' Court heard in March 2022 that Mrs Barton wrote to prosecutors a month before the scheduled trial to claim she was injured accidentally when friends intervened in an argument between the pair, having both drunk "four or five bottles of wine".

Not supporting prosecution

Mrs Barton did not support the prosecution and was not due to be called as a prosecution witness during the trial over fears she would give an untruthful account.

Lawyers for Barton said this would leave him at a disadvantage as it meant she could not be questioned over inconsistencies in her evidence.

However, Dame Victoria said the prosecution was only obliged to call witnesses who had provided witness statements they planned to rely on and it was not "an abuse of process" to not call Mrs Barton.

The judge, sitting with Mr Justice Saini, added that Mrs Barton had never provided a witness statement and had also "expressed an unwillingness from the outset to give evidence against her husband".

Dame Victoria concluded: "No prejudice could conceivably have been caused to Mr Barton if Mrs Barton had been called by the defence, or by the court for that matter."