Judge pauses Trump plan to put thousands of USAID staff on leave
- Published
A judge has temporarily blocked President Donald Trump's plan to place 2,200 employees of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) on paid leave, hours before it was due to happen.
Judge Carl Nichols said he would issue a "very limited" temporary restraining order in response to a lawsuit filed by unions, challenging the plan to place thousands of staff on leave from midnight on Friday.
USAID, which is the US government's main overseas development arm, employs about 10,000 people, two-thirds of whom work overseas. It's unclear where the remaining staff stand regarding their jobs.
Under Trump's plan, some 611 employees would have been kept working at the agency. The ruling came as officials removed and covered USAID signs at the organisation's headquarters in Washington DC.
Trump has argued that USAID is not a valuable use of taxpayer money. It is one of many federal agencies his administration is targeting as it works to slash federal spending in the US.
The Republican campaigned on overhauling the government and formed an advisory body named the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) - led by tech billionaire Elon Musk - to slash the budget.
Friday's ruling by Judge Nichols came in response to an emergency petition by the American Foreign Service Association and American Federation of Government Employees - two unions representing employees of the agency.
Judge Nichols, who was nominated by Trump during his first term, said the written order would be issued later and go into more detail.
The organisations who sued told the BBC they were waiting for the text of the court order to find out how all employees at USAID would be affected.
But for now, it appeared that the more than 2,000 direct hires at the agency who are part of the unions would be safe, according to Lauren Bateman an attorney at Public Citizen, an advocacy group that filed the lawsuit.
About 500 USAID staff have already been placed on leave by the Trump administration.
During the hearing, the judge did not seem likely to grant other requests as part of the lawsuit, including to restore grants and contracts or reopen USAID buildings.
The legal action argued that the president was violating the US Constitution and federal law by attempting to dismantle the agency.
"Not a single one of defendants' actions to dismantle USAID were taken pursuant to congressional authorization," it said.
"And pursuant to federal statute, Congress is the only entity that may lawfully dismantle the agency."
Representing the Trump administration, justice department official Brett Shumate told the judge that the president "has decided there is corruption and fraud at USAID".
Hours after Trump took office on 20 January, he signed an executive order halting all foreign assistance until such funds were vetted and aligned with his "America First" policy.
That led to a stop work order at USAID, which has in turn upended the global aid system as hundreds of programmes have been frozen in countries around the world.
On Friday, Trump posted on his Truth Social platform: "USAID IS DRIVING THE RADICAL LEFT CRAZY.
"THE CORRUPTION IS AT LEVELS RARELY SEEN BEFORE. CLOSE IT DOWN!"
The US is by far the biggest single provider of humanitarian aid around the world. It has bases in more than 60 countries and works in dozens of others, with much of its work carried out by its contractors.
According to government data, the US spent $68bn (£55bn) on international aid in 2023.
That total is spread across several departments and agencies, but USAID's budget constitutes more than half of it at around $40bn - that's about 0.6% of total US annual government spending of $6.75tn.
The head of the United Nations' programme for tackling HIV/AIDS told the BBC that the cuts would have dire impacts across the globe.
"AIDS related deaths in the next 5 years will increase by 6.3 million" if funding is not restored, UNAIDS executive director Winnie Byanyima said.
Former USAID chiefs have criticised the reported cutback plan. One of them, Gayle Smith, stressed to the BBC that the US had always been the fastest to arrive during humanitarian crises around the world.
"When you pull all of that out, you send some very dangerous messages," Smith said. "The US is signalling that we don't frankly care whether people live or die and that we're not a reliable partner."