Firm made 'false claims' over Grenfell cladding

Bereaved and survivors of the Grenfell Tower disaster said the inquiry's report showed they were "failed by calculated dishonesty and greed"

A cladding company made "false and misleading claims" about its product being suitable for Grenfell Tower before the 2017 fire, an inquiry concluded.

The final report into the disaster has set out how a chain of failures led to the blaze that killed 72 people.

Cladding had already been found to be the "principal" reason for the fire's rapid spread.

Celotex, based in Hadleigh, Suffolk was one of two firms that made the insulation inside the cladding, but said decisions on Grenfell's selection of materials were made by "construction industry professionals".

In the final report by inquiry chairman Sir Martin Moore-Bick, firms including Celotex received heavy criticism.

The company "embarked on a dishonest scheme to mislead its customers and the wider market", Sir Martin concluded.

"One very significant reason why Grenfell Tower came to be clad in combustible materials was systematic dishonesty on the part of those who made and sold the rain-screen cladding panels and insulation products," he said.

Firms had "engaged in deliberate and sustained strategies to manipulate the testing processes, misrepresent test data and mislead the market", the report said.

The final report into the Grenfell Tower fire has been published

A spokesperson for Celotex said it was considering the final report "with care".

They said the company conducted its own review immediately after the fire to "interrogate the circumstances in which the RS5000 product had been tested, launched and marketed".

"This review was a significant and thorough undertaking, and the results of that work were disclosed promptly and proactively to relevant stakeholders, including the Grenfell Tower Inquiry," they continued.

"Independent testing, commissioned following the review, demonstrated that the cladding system described in the Celotex RS5000 marketing literature met the relevant safety criteria.

"That system was substantially different to that used at Grenfell Tower. Decisions about design, construction and the selection of materials for the tower were made by construction industry professionals."

The company said it continued to "co-operate fully" with investigations and reiterated its sympathies to those affected.

The spokesperson added it had "reviewed and improved process controls, quality management and the approach to marketing within the Celotex business to meet industry best practice".