BBC Homepage
  • Skip to content
  • Accessibility Help
  • Your account
  • Notifications
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • iPlayer
  • Sounds
  • Bitesize
  • CBBC
  • CBeebies
  • Food
  • More menu
More menu
Search BBC
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • iPlayer
  • Sounds
  • Bitesize
  • CBBC
  • CBeebies
  • Food
Close menu
BBC News
Menu
  • Home
  • InDepth
  • Israel-Gaza war
  • War in Ukraine
  • Climate
  • UK
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Culture
More
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Health
  • Family & Education
  • In Pictures
  • Newsbeat
  • BBC Verify
  • Disability
  • BBC Trending

YouTubers face £4,600 bill over copyright claims

  • Published
    13 January 2020
Share page
About sharing
A still of the video in questionImage source, RM Videos
Image caption,

Above is a still taken from one of the four videos at the centre of the controversy

Tom Gerken
BBC News

Two YouTubers have been told to pay $6,000 (£4,600) or risk losing their YouTube channel completely.

MxR and Potastic Panda are known for making videos where they react to memes and other online content.

But it turns out four videos they watched have been bought up by a media company, which has slapped them with a bill for infringing its copyright.

And unless they pay, their channel could now be removed due to the nuances of YouTube's copyright system.

A channel receives a strike against it if a copyright owner formally notifies YouTube that a copyright infringement has taken place. Receiving three strikes, according to Google, external, results in a YouTube channel being "subject to termination".

MxR Plays is a YouTube channel which often involves 'reaction videos' - where people film themselves reacting to anything from memes to movie trailers.

MxR and Potastic Panda, the YouTubers who host the channel, say they have received four copyright claims in the same bill from Jukin Media, with Google yet to be notified. Their joint channel has 840,000 subscribers - and MxR has a personal following of more than two million.

MxR tweeted his concerns that because of the 'three strikes' rule, if he doesn't pay up Jukin Media could contact Google with all four claims at once and potentially "take down" the channel.

MxR's tweetImage source, MxR/Twitter
Image caption,

MxR lamented that just one of the couple's videos will cost them $3,000 (£2,300) because it contained footage from two Jukin Media clips.

"Today we got hit with a huge bill of $6,000," said MxR in a YouTube video viewed 1.3 million times. "I think it's because in the past we've paid them about $2,000 (£1,500).

"If you don't pay they'll start striking your channel - they'll basically remove our channel if we don't pay them."

  • YouTube's copyright claim system abused by extorters

  • Mark Hamill supports Star Wars superfan's emotional reaction video

  • SpongeBob SquarePants fan claims Nickelodeon copied art

He said that the couple do a "very thorough search" to see if the content in their videos is already owned by a media company, but it is not always easy.

"Sometimes they are videos where it's just a cat," he said, "and there's really nothing you can search for.

"You end up having to search through 40 pages of videos and sometimes you miss one of them. If they treat every YouTuber like this, thousands of channels will be deleted."

Jukin Media, the company which owns the four videos, has responded in a lengthy social media post, claiming the YouTubers are "making money off of videos that don't belong to you".

Jukin Media's tweetImage source, Jukin Media/Twitter

"As we've mentioned repeatedly," the Jukin Media statement reads, external, "you can completely avoid any issues related to copyright by simply licensing videos on our website.

"In effect, you're taking other peoples' videos without asking them, then posting them to your channel and making money off of them.

"We never want to issue copyright strikes - we have a duty to do so to protect the copyright of the creators who have signed with us."

Do the YouTubers have to pay?

Leonard J. French is a copyright lawyer based in the United States who is also a YouTuber with more than 100,000 subscribers.

He told the BBC that the question being brought up by commenters online is whether the YouTubers should pay at all - or if their video falls under the legal principle known as fair use.

"It's very possible that MxR Plays are not making a fair use," he said. "But I and my fellow attorneys don't actually know how a judge or jury would find if this went to a trial because fair use is such an in-depth analysis.

"It's right on the line. Did this channel make enough additional commentary or criticism to overcome the hurdles to fair use, or did they just republish the original material without adding enough transformative content to make it a new material?

"That's the difference between no damages and massive damages with nothing in between."

This YouTube post cannot be displayed in your browser. Please enable Javascript or try a different browser.View original content on YouTube
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. YouTube content may contain adverts.
Skip youtube video by Lawful Masses with Leonard French

Allow YouTube content?

This article contains content provided by Google YouTube. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. You may want to read Google’s cookie policy, external and privacy policy, external before accepting. To view this content choose ‘accept and continue’.

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. YouTube content may contain adverts.
End of youtube video by Lawful Masses with Leonard French

He said that according to US copyright law (specifically 17 U.S.C. section 106-7), there are four points which need to be addressed to ascertain whether something qualifies as fair use or not.

line

How to tell if your video might qualify as fair use according to Leonard J. French

  • The copyrighted part of the video has been transformed into something new, such as commentary or criticism

  • The original copyrighted work is not being used for profit, as opposed to being used for commercial purposes

  • A very small proportion of the original copyrighted work has been used (such as a single frame from a video), with more original content added

  • The video has not usurped the market - meaning people do not need to watch the original anymore

line

Leonard said that while $6,000 may seem like a lot, it could potentially be a lot more if the issue ever went to court.

"As a copyright attorney working in this field," he said, "I can say this is a normal demand and may even be a reasonable demand.

"But there are different ways to calculate damages in the US. If Jukin Media has registered the copyrights before making this claim, they could get damages up to $150,000 (£115,000) in court.

"If they have not registered the copyrights, they would only be able to claim actual damages, which are the original fee for the video's use ($49/£37) plus attorney's fees.

"Legally it's not an issue to make a demand for $1,500, but it seems morally outrageous to go after a channel like this for that much money per video."

More on this story

  • How YouTube copyright extortion works

    • Published
      14 February 2019
    The YouTube logo split between a wall and a phone screen
  • Star Wars superfan defended by Mark Hamill

    • Published
      17 April 2019
    Eric Butts is crying while watching the new Star Wars trailer
  • Nickelodeon accused of stealing SpongeBob art

    • Published
      5 July 2019
    SpongeBob making a rainbow with his hands

Top stories

  • Live. 

    Starmer tells BBC he wants to 'bring forward' target to close all asylum hotels

    • 10453 viewing10k viewing
  • Why Starmer wants No 10 rejig after a year in power

    • Published
      2 hours ago
  • Live. 

    More than 800 killed in Afghanistan quake, UN agency says, as rescue efforts continue

    • 4319 viewing4.3k viewing

More to explore

  • How sheer luck made this tiny Caribbean island millions from its web address

    A beach in Anguilla
  • Met Office releases new storm names for 2025-26

    • Attribution
      Weather
    Large waves crashing on Newhaven Breakwater Light at Newhaven Harbour, East Sussex
  • Peak rail fares scrapped on ScotRail trains

    A close-up image of a train ticket from Edinburgh to Glasgow Central, held in someone's hand. The ticket is orange and white.
  • Liverpool agree British record £125m fee for Isak

    • Attribution
      Sport
    Sweden striker Alexander Isak
  • China's navy is expanding at breakneck speed - and catching up with the US

    Aircraft carrier Liaoning sets for sea trial at Dalian shipyard with the help of towboats after nearly one year of maintenance on February 29, 2024 in Dalian, Liaoning Province of China.
  • 'Camilla saw off attacker with shoe' and 'Farage scare tactics'

    A composite image of the front pages of the Daily Mail and the Daily Mirror on 1 September 2025
  • York thrillers and underdog moments - World Cup talking points

    • Attribution
      Sport
    South Africa players celebrate
  • Canada's first lunar rover looks to future space exploration

    A computer generated image of the lunar vehicle on the surface of the Moon
  • Modi and Xi meet: Trump as the wildcard and other takeaways

    Narendra Modi and Xi Jinping smile for the cameras on stage against a shimmering blue and orange backdrop. Modi is wearing a blue vest over a white kurta with a golden pocket handkerchief, Xi is wearing a navy blue suit and a maroon tie.
loading elsewhere stories

Most read

  1. 1

    EU chief von der Leyen's plane hit by suspected Russian GPS jamming

  2. 2

    Why Starmer wants No 10 rejig after a year in power

  3. 3

    I chose my Caesarean date to be eligible for 30 hours of funded childcare

  4. 4

    House price growth slows amid property tax calls

  5. 5

    Putin says he reached 'understandings' with Trump over end of Ukraine war

  6. 6

    Jewellery boss in £170m scam told shop staff to pretend to be customers

  7. 7

    How sheer luck made this tiny Caribbean island millions from its web address

  8. 8

    Children at risk of identity theft and fraud from 'sharenting'

  9. 9

    'Weight loss jabs gave me my life back'

  10. 10

    UK to tighten family member rules for asylum cases

BBC News Services

  • On your mobile
  • On smart speakers
  • Get news alerts
  • Contact BBC News

The Big Cases

  • The biggest crime stories and court cases in the UK

    • Attribution
      iPlayer
    The Big Cases
  • The travel agent who conned hundreds of holidaymakers

    • Attribution
      iPlayer
    The Big Cases: Sunshine Scammer
  • Unmasking a US fugitive 'who faked his own death'

    • Attribution
      iPlayer
    The Big Cases: Unmasking a Fugitive
  • The events behind a nationwide manhunt that ended in tragedy

    • Attribution
      iPlayer
    The Big Cases: The Aristocrat, the Convict and the Missing Baby
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • iPlayer
  • Sounds
  • Bitesize
  • CBBC
  • CBeebies
  • Food
  • Terms of Use
  • About the BBC
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Accessibility Help
  • Parental Guidance
  • Contact the BBC
  • Make an editorial complaint
  • BBC emails for you

Copyright © 2025 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.