BBC Homepage
  • Skip to content
  • Accessibility Help
  • Your account
  • Notifications
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • iPlayer
  • Sounds
  • Bitesize
  • CBBC
  • CBeebies
  • Food
  • More menu
More menu
Search BBC
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • iPlayer
  • Sounds
  • Bitesize
  • CBBC
  • CBeebies
  • Food
Close menu
BBC News
Menu
  • Home
  • InDepth
  • Israel-Gaza war
  • War in Ukraine
  • Climate
  • UK
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Culture
More
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Health
  • Family & Education
  • In Pictures
  • Newsbeat
  • BBC Verify
  • Disability
  • BBC Trending

Climate change: Small army of volunteers keeping deniers off Wikipedia

  • Published
    24 December 2021
Share page
About sharing
Photo of Wikipedia volunteer David TettaImage source, David Tetta
Image caption,

Wikipedia volunteer David Tetta

ByMarco Silva
Climate change disinformation specialist

Wikipedia has for so long been plagued by climate change denial. But a group of dedicated volunteers around the world is working tirelessly to keep the deniers at bay.

David Tetta lives in northern California, in the kind of close-knit community where neighbours just wander into each other's homes - during our interview, he breaks off for a second to shoo one of them out of the room.

It was while chatting to his neighbours that David first thought of volunteering to edit Wikipedia. In 2019, around the time wildfires were raging across the state, climate change was coming up more and more often as a topic.

"Many conversations seemed to evolve into people expressing their feelings of angst and fear about the environment," he says.

"I was wondering, what kind of information are people getting?"

David was well-placed to study the subject, having worked for the US Environmental Protection Agency for more than 30 years.

He looked at the most obvious starting point for climate change information, Wikipedia - and, as he diplomatically puts it, he found "certain areas of it that could be improved".

He started small by proposing edits and discussing them with other volunteers. But he soon found himself pouring hundreds of hours into Wikipedia editing.

"You have to read through about 100 pages of scientific information to edit a sentence," he says.

English Wikipedia alone gets more than nine billion page views a month, external, and the magnitude of that figure is not lost on David.

"It gives you a certain sense of responsibility for making sure you're getting it right."

The point of Wikipedia is that anyone with an internet connection can edit it. But that also makes it vulnerable to manipulation, and those who deny the climate crisis know it.

They've been waging an editing war to get their views across, and subtlety is not always their forte.

On one occasion, someone added a sentence wrongly suggesting climate scientists worldwide are in the pocket of a secretive Communist organisation.

Another user peppered paragraphs with the word "alleged", wrongly suggesting that basic climate science is far less settled than you might think.

And, in a rather mischievous twist, one time the entire text of an article on climate change was turned into a hyperlink. Users clicking on any of it would immediately be taken to an article about hoaxes.

Those kinds of stunts don't last long, though.

"That might stay up for a few minutes or an hour or so," David says. "But usually, one of the editors will spot it."

  • Listen to The Denial Files: 'We fight climate denial on Wikipedia' from the BBC World Service

David is part of a small but dedicated group of volunteers, external who have made it their mission to curate and protect articles about climate change on English Wikipedia. And they're not afraid to pick a fight.

"I'll send [the deniers] a note on their personal page on Wikipedia saying, 'This is vandalism, this could have consequences,'" says David. "Sometimes these people get kicked off Wikipedia."

Red flags

Wikipedia, which was launched in 2001, has grown into one of the world's most popular websites, and is published in more than 300 different languages, external.

English Wikipedia is the largest version, external - and, according to the editors interviewed for this piece, the one where you can find the most reliable coverage of climate change.

Photo of Wikipedia volunteer Femke NijsseImage source, Femke Nijsse
Image caption,

Femke Nijsse is one of the most influential editors in the Wikipedia climate change community

"We are lucky with a large editor base," says Dutch volunteer Femke Nijsse.

She's come to be regarded as one of the most influential voices within the small community of Wikipedia editors specialising in climate change.

If you have ever visited the main Wikipedia article on climate change, chances are that you read some of Femke's words - she's the user who's contributed the most, external to that article by far.

"I'm quite proud of my work on Wikipedia," she says.

Femke is a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Exeter, studying the transition to green energy - so global warming is something she's been thinking about for a while.

She's been editing Wikipedia articles for seven years and in that time she's got to know what junk science looks like.

"Editors recognise all of the common climate denial myths, and most editors have a good feeling for misinformation red flags, including use of unreliable sources, of emotive words," she says.

"The most satisfying editing for me is the removal of misinformation."

Femke is clinical in her debunking of bad science, and a stickler for Wikipedia's rules.

In October, a user tried to add a sentence to the climate change article, wrongly suggesting that stopping the world from using fossil fuels would make no difference to global warming. Femke dismissed the edit, but not before explaining that such a statement would have to be backed by reliable sources.

  • Climate denial spreads on foreign-language Wikipedia

  • How Covid conspiracists are shifting to climate denial

  • Climate denial flows unchecked on Facebook

Wikipedia doesn't have a policy vetoing climate change denial, but there are policies that insist you have to cite quality sources, external, which tends to weed unscientific content out.

"Wikipedia is just an uncomfortable place to be if you want to promote a point of view that goes against science," says volunteer editor Su-Laine Brodsky, a technology writer by profession. "It's much easier to be on social media, where you can say whatever you want, and not really be held to task for it."

From her home in Canada, Su-Laine has been editing Wikipedia pages for 15 years.

Photo of Wikipedia volunteer Su-Laine BrodskyImage source, Su-Laine Brodsky
Image caption,

Wikipedia volunteer Su-Laine Brodsky says climate misinformation can "polarise" people

She started out by sharing medical information and moved on to writing about sea otters and killer whales. She only recently decided to focus on climate pages.

"I've always been interested in the environment and wildlife, and was kind of intimidated by the idea of working on climate change," she says. "I thought of climate change as a very technical and very controversial topic."

But one day she stumbled across an article on sustainable energy that was riddled with problems. "It had a lot of self-promotion - companies promoting themselves, people who are doing some kind of research promoting their pet project."

Su-Laine got stuck in and started getting rid of it.

"Wikipedians are people who fix things," she says. "You notice something that's wrong, and you just need to have enough confidence to say, 'I can make this suck a bit less.'"

Sometimes the errors are obvious. But it didn't take long for Su-Laine to realise some users were twisting the facts in subtler ways, especially in less-trafficked articles.

"When you've got an article about a climate science denier, people will try to soften that by saying so-and-so is a 'climate policy analyst'. That's a way of making the person sound more credible," she says.

Immune system

According to Alex Stinson from the Wikimedia Foundation, which runs Wikipedia, climate misinformation ranges from neglect - science that's out of date - to a lack of balance, to active disinformation.

He's confident the organisation has what it takes to deal with the problem.

"All of the studies on vandalism and misinformation suggest that our natural immune system on the big language Wikipedias catches something like 97% of it rapidly," he says.

  • Wikipedia in Chinese editing war of words

  • How Wikipedia maintains its reputation for accuracy

  • Wikipedia at 20: The encyclopaedia in five articles

As well as human editors, the organisation also uses computer bots to fight vandalism. High-profile articles, including some about climate, also benefit from additional layers of protection - some of them can only be edited by users with a certain amount of editing experience.

But there will always be areas of the website that are harder to patrol.

"There are over 6,300,000 articles on English Wikipedia," Alex says. "Not all of those are under the same kind of universal scrutiny of the community."

And bad information, even outright conspiracies theories, are more common on climate pages in languages other than English, according to a recent BBC investigation.

For now, it is entirely down to volunteers to hold the fort.

"Wikipedia is uneven," says Su-Laine. "You have to still take it with a grain of salt."

  • Listen to The Denial Files: 'We fight climate denial on Wikipedia' from the BBC World Service

The Denial Files branding - a planet with headphones on a background of fire

Related topics

  • Disinformation
  • Climate

Top stories

  • Trump suggests Starmer could use military to control UK borders

    • Published
      37 minutes ago
  • Key takeaways from Trump-Starmer news conference

    • Published
      1 hour ago
  • First migrant deported to France under 'one in one out' deal

    • Published
      2 hours ago

More to explore

  • Royals, Maga and tech CEOs: What we learned from state banquet guest list

    A long dining table with dignitaries seated down either side is seen in a banquet hall, with staff and press against the walls.
  • The Summer I Turned Pretty to conclude with feature film

    Lola Tung, left, wears a low cut silver dress as she places her right hand on teh shoulder of her I Turned Pretty co-star Christopher Briney on a red carpet. Behind them is a poster that says The Summer I Turned Pretty: The Movie.
  • 'Slot-age time' - breaking down Liverpool's late success

    • Attribution
      Sport
    A composition graphic of Arne Slot, Virgil van Dijk, and Mohamed Salah celebrate some of Liverpool's late winners
  • Leonardo DiCaprio on why his new film addresses 'divisiveness in our culture'

    Leonardo DiCaprio attends the "One Battle After Another" London Premiere at Odeon Luxe Leicester Square on September 16, 2025 in London, England
  • In pictures: Chequers, scout groups and a dolls' house - day two of Trump's state visit

    The Princess of Wales (left) and First Lady Melania Trump in Frogmore Gardens in Windsor, Berkshire, on day two of US President Donald Trump's second state visit to the UK.
  • Fashion risks going backwards on diversity, says ex-Vogue boss

    Edward Enninful in a suit and bow tie
  • 'Day by day, year by year' - Borg on cancer diagnosis

    • Attribution
      Sport
    Bjorn Borg waits to serve during the 1980 Wimbledon final against John McEnroe
  • 'Ultimate in cancel culture': Fans outside Jimmy Kimmel studio react to show's axing

    Split image of man on the right and woman on the left outside Jimmy Kimmel studio in LA
  • Katty Kay: America is at a dangerous crossroads following the Charlie Kirk shooting

    A treated image of Charlie Kirk in front of the flag, with his hand pointing up
loading elsewhere stories

Most read

  1. 1

    Trump suggests Starmer could use military to control UK borders

  2. 2

    Scientists pinpoint the brain's internal mileage clock

  3. 3

    Sally Rooney says she cannot enter UK in case of arrest

  4. 4

    Corbyn and Sultana clash over new party membership

  5. 5

    Key takeaways from Trump-Starmer news conference

  6. 6

    First migrant deported to France under 'one in one out' deal

  7. 7

    In pictures: Chequers, scout groups and a dolls' house - day two of Trump's state visit

  8. 8

    Two teenagers charged over Transport for London cyber attack

  9. 9

    Royals, Maga and tech CEOs: What we learned from state banquet guest list

  10. 10

    Man who died in park shooting named as suspect

BBC News Services

  • On your mobile
  • On smart speakers
  • Get news alerts
  • Contact BBC News

Best of the BBC

  • Stacey and Joe welcome you back to Pickle Cottage

    • Attribution
      iPlayer
    Stacey & Joe
  • What's the future of home parcel delivery?

    • Attribution
      Sounds
  • The state of the UK-US special relationship examined

    • Attribution
      iPlayer
    Panorama: Trump and Starmer
  • A couple's search for the Croydon cat killer

    • Attribution
      Sounds
    Illuminated: The Cat Killer Detectives
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • iPlayer
  • Sounds
  • Bitesize
  • CBBC
  • CBeebies
  • Food
  • Terms of Use
  • About the BBC
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Accessibility Help
  • Parental Guidance
  • Contact the BBC
  • Make an editorial complaint
  • BBC emails for you

Copyright © 2025 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.