Ulez: More than 300 cameras damaged or stolen in four months

  • Published
Ulez camera vandalised
Image caption,

Between 1 April and 16 August, the Met received 339 reports of camera cables being damaged, or cameras being stolen or obscured

More than 300 cameras installed for London's Ultra Low Emission Zone (Ulez) were vandalised or stolen between April and mid-August, the BBC can reveal.

Over four months, the Met received 339 reports of camera cables being damaged, or cameras being stolen or obscured.

The actual number of cameras affected is likely to be even higher as one report can represent multiple cameras.

Unofficial data mapping the location of disabled cameras suggests that almost 500 cameras could have been affected.

It also suggests that the vast majority have been in outer London where the zone is being expanded.

Some 1,900 cameras have been installed in outer London so far.

Despite so much damage being caused, one man has so far been charged by police.

Image source, Met Police
Image caption,

The Met is trying to trace a man in connection with four offences in Hillingdon, Harrow and Uxbridge

Scotland Yard has now released an image of a man detectives are trying to trace in connection with four offences in Hillingdon, Harrow and Uxbridge on 17 June.

Cdr Owain Richards said the Met had "a team of officers investigating and identifying those responsible" and was working with TfL to "identify new ways to prevent further cameras from being damaged or stolen".

The force has not revealed the locations of any of the disabled cameras but a group of people calling themselves Julie's Ulez map, who are opposed to the Ulez expansion, worked to track the locations and damage caused to cameras.

The map shows there are 1,619 cameras outside the North and South circular roads with 461 of those reported as vandalised or stolen - equating to 28% of the Transport for London's (TfL) network cameras.

Kingsley Hamilton, who runs one of most popular anti-Ulez social media groups, told the BBC he could see why "if someone is in a desperate situation and has no way out" they may turn to vandalism.

"I don't condone it but I won't explicitly say you can't do that. It would be wrong for me to say you're a bad person for doing that (vandalising cameras)," he added.

Image source, Chris Brown
Image caption,

Black pins relate to stolen cameras and blue pins show damaged cameras

TfL is planning to install a total of 2,750 cameras before the expansion comes into force at the end of August.

Speaking at Mayor's Question Time on 20 July, Sadiq Khan said transport bosses were confident "there will be the same number of cameras up on 29 August that they had originally planned" and that "there is no need for Plan Bs, Cs or anything else".

The BBC visited one area in south-east London where seven cameras had recently been damaged. Residents there had mixed views.

Abbie Mires, who works in the area, said the "harsh action" of targeting Ulez cameras was justified.

"It is criminal, but at the end of the day people are trying to prove a point and no one is listening. Old people who've been using their cars for years and years now have to stop driving because they can't afford it," she said.

Image caption,

Abbie Mires said transport bosses were not listening to criticism of the Ulez expansion plans

Other residents like Sam Lockwood said damaging Ulez cameras was a "step too far".

"Maybe they think they are Robin Hood characters trying to help others and if they want to risk it that's fair enough. But I think there are better ways to fight the system," he said.

Husband and wife, Roy and Linda McKensie had to get rid of two cars ahead of the Ulez expansion, but said disabling cameras was "criminal activity whichever way you look at it" which they "don't agree with".

Linda added: "I know things are awkward. I know things are frustrating. But if it all ends up getting lawless it's not going to work."

Image caption,

Roy McKensie said he was concerned that if people choose to pay £12.50 instead of changing their cars air pollution levels would not improve

A spokesperson for TfL said: "Criminal damage to the cameras puts the perpetrators at risk of prosecution and life-changing injuries, while simultaneously risking the safety of the public."

When the BBC asked TfL and the mayor's office about the costs of vandalism it was told that "due to commercial and confidentiality reasons, it cannot share the unit cost of cameras, or for repair of cameras".

The only figure the BBC has seen was an estimate cost of the planned expansion from November 2022, which was about £159.5m based on assumptions at that time.

This includes spend for systems design, development and testing; on-street infrastructure design, procurement and delivery including camera installation and signage; marketing and media campaign; and legal and consultation costs.

Related internet links

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.