PSNI officers disciplined 'to allay threat to Sinn Féin policing support'

Uniformed officers arrested a man at the memorial on Belfast's Ormeau Road in February 2021

Two junior PSNI officers were unlawfully disciplined for an arrest made at a Troubles commemoration in Belfast, a judge has ruled.

Mr Justice Scoffield said the officers were disciplined to allay any threat of Sinn Féin abandoning its support for policing in Northern Ireland.

He quashed decisions to suspend one probationary constable and re-position his colleague.

Chief Constable Simon Byrne said he accepted the findings of the court.

But added that neither officer has been disciplined to date.

The Police Federation and unionist political parties have criticised the leadership of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI).

The incident happened on the Ormeau Road in February 2021.

A service marking the anniversary of the February 1992 Sean Graham bookmakers attack in which five people were murdered and nine others injured by the UFF was being held.

In February 2021 the annual wreath-laying ceremony at the scene took place amid restrictions on public gatherings due to Covid-19 regulations.

During that event, attended by up to 30 people, one man who had been shot and injured in the 1992 attack was detained on suspicion of disorderly behaviour and put in handcuffs.

Five people were killed and several others injured in the 1992 gun attack

He was later released without charge.

The chief constable later apologised for the incident and confirmed the disciplinary steps taken against the two recently recruited officers.

Although the suspension and re-positioning decisions were lifted later that year following a review, both constables remained aggrieved at their treatment.

Backed by the Police Federation, the pair applied for a judicial review into the lawfulness of the disciplinary moves.

In a statement, one of the constables said he felt isolated, abandoned, embarrassed and demoralised by the decision to suspend him.

A chief inspector who served him with the notice allegedly remarked that it was the first time in 30 years that he disagreed with a suspension decision, but was following lawful orders.

• 'No political bias' in Ormeau Road arrest

• PSNI chief asked not to comment on Ormeau incident

Counsel for the officers argued that the PSNI got it wrong by focusing on the fallout, rather than the seriousness of any alleged misconduct.

High Court judge Mr Justice Scoffield was told that as a deputy chief constable went to deal with the incident he received a phone call from Sinn Féin's police spokesperson, Gerry Kelly, as part of a "frenzy of activity" in the immediate aftermath.

His attention was also drawn to the arrest being made within days of an alleged loyalist show of strength at Pitt Park in east Belfast where up to 60 masked men gathered without any immediate police intervention.

At the time, Sinn Féin's deputy first minister, Michelle O'Neill, tweeted about an apparent culture of double standards in the PSNI and of "turning a blind eye to UDA and UVF thugs, while targeting those laying flowers on the anniversary of loved ones".

Mr Byrne later confirmed he spoke to her about the events on the Ormeau Road.

A barrister representing the chief constable insisted he had defused an unprecedented, critical incident which drew heavy criticism from Sinn Féin and jeopardised wider public confidence in Northern Ireland's reformed police service.

Despite expressing sympathy for two young constables described as having acted "over-zealously", counsel claimed the incident created an existential threat to the PSNI.

However, Mr Justice Scoffield ruled that it involved a "legally impermissible" assessment of the public interest.

Chief Constable Simon Byrne confirmed he spoke to Sinn Féin's Michelle O'Neill about the events on the Ormeau Road

"Both the deputy chief constable and the chief constable were acutely aware of the threat of Sinn Féin withdrawing support for policing and/or withdrawing from the Policing Board if immediate action was not taken in respect of the officers' duty status," he said.

"It is impossible to avoid the conclusion that the pressure so exerted was, in large measure, a result of a wholly separate and unrelated (Pitt Park) incident which was wrongly conflated with the actions of the applicants in the incident in which they were involved."

The judge held: "I have been persuaded that the respondent imposed suspension in the first applicant's case because of the threat (whether real or perceived) that, if it did not do so, republican support for policing would be withdrawn. 

"To reach a decision on that basis was in my view unlawful."

Despite acknowledging the difficult situation in which the PSNI was placed, he concluded that the decision to move the second officer was also influenced by the same threat, real or perceived, that one party would quit Northern Ireland's Policing Board unless the duty status of both probationary constables at the commemoration event was changed.

Mr Justice Scoffield confirmed: "I will allow the applicants' judicial review on the limited grounds explained, and will quash the decision made to suspend the first applicant and the decision to re-position the second applicant. 

"Although the practical effect of those decisions has dissipated, given that they have previously been lifted upon review, I consider the applicants are entitled to a form of relief which removes those decisions from their records as a matter of law."

Reacting to the judgement, the chief constable, Mr Byrne, said he accepted "there was a legal error in the way in which the public interest test was applied in deciding to suspend one officer and reposition another, rendering the action unlawful".

He added: "It is important however to clarify that neither officer has been disciplined to date.

"This judgment relates to the decision to suspend one officer and reposition another whilst the Police Ombudsman conducted an investigation following a public complaint.

"We will of course take time to carefully consider the full judgment to ensure any lessons are learnt to prevent any future recurrence."

'Sacrificed for political expediency'

Liam Kelly, chair of the Police Federation, said the officers had been "sacrificed on the altar of political expediency in a disgraceful attempt to pander to political pressure".

He added: "In our view, this High Court judgement calls into question the decision-making of the senior executive team right up to and including the deputy chief constable and the chief constable himself.

"The two officers will be delighted by this outcome.

"Unfortunately one of them still finds himself being subjected to a disciplinary process and, in light of this conclusion, we would demand the PSNI expedite this matter forthwith."

Democratic Unionist Party MLA Trevor Clarke said "PSNI officers were thrown to the wolves by their own bosses to placate Sinn Fein".

"There are huge questions to be answered around this case when a court has ultimately determined that two-tier policing has operated in Northern Ireland."

Ulster Unionist Party leader Doug Beattie said that "no political party, Sinn Féin or otherwise, should be able to influence the actions of the PSNI leadership through political threats. Actual or perceived." He also confirmed that his party has called for an urgent meeting in response to the ruling.

Traditional Unionist Voice leader Jim Allister said the ruling was "a staggering indictment of the chief constable and a sobering insight into the politics of 'keep Sinn Féin happy at all costs', even at the cost of sacrificing your own officers."