Showing Brexit legal advice is in PM's interest, Crabb says
- Published
The pressure on Theresa May to publish the full legal advice on her Brexit deal might be "overwhelming", a former Welsh secretary has warned.
Stephen Crabb said it could be in the UK government's interest to release the advice to dispel "mistrust" around the process.
MPs from all parties have called for the complete text to be released, and passed a binding vote last month.
The prime minister insists the full details should remain confidential.
Attorney General Geoffrey Cox told the Commons on Monday that the UK would be indefinitely committed to the EU customs rules if Brexit trade talks broek down.
But, publishing an overview of his legal advice, said it would not be in either side's political interests to allow that to happen.
MPs have said this will not not respect the binding Commons vote, which required the government to lay before Parliament "any legal advice in full".
Mr Crabb, the Preseli Pembrokshire MP, told BBC Radio 4's Westminster Hour: "I think the pressure to publish this may be overwhelming.
"I think there is so much mistrust around the entire Brexit process.... conspiracy theories... new ones cropping up every few days.
"It may actually well be in the government's interest just to get out and publish the full text."
The House of Commons debate on Mrs May's deal is due to get under way on Tuesday,
Brexit-supporting MPs say they will oppose the "backstop" plan to prevent a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic, claiming it could lock the UK into a customs union with the EU.
Mr Crabb said the numbers on the final vote - due on 11 December - look "pretty horrific" for the prime minister's hopes of winning approval.
He added: "I do not think anybody is going to be going into the start of the debate on Tuesday afternoon thinking this deal is going to succeed and get voted through.
"The question is what happens next."
Torfaen Labour MP Nick Thomas-Symonds, shadow solicitor general, told the Commons on Monday that the overview was a "legal commentary" and not the "final legal advice to cabinet".
"Isn't the reality of this situation that the government does not want MPs to see the full legal advice for fear of the political consequences," he said.
"The government should do the right thing and make this full advice available, with so much at stake for all our constituents, with eight days to go before the vote on the deal, this House and this country deserves better from this government," he said.
- Published3 December 2018