Arctic deal bans North Pole fishing

  • Published
Sea-ice
Image caption,

Thinning ice is melting during the summer months and fish stocks are likely to head north

The US and Russia are among five countries to have signed a deal to prevent commercial fishing in the melting Arctic sea ice near the North Pole.

Norway, Canada and Denmark also backed the agreement signed in Oslo.

Although the central Arctic is unlikely to have fish stocks for some time, scientists believe they will arrive as thinning ice melts in the summer.

Several neighbouring nations have submitted claims to Arctic territory.

A 21-member UN arbitration panel is considering the competing claims, with the focus on the Lomonosov Ridge, a 1,800km-long (1,120 miles) underwater mountain range that splits the Arctic in two.

Image source, AP
Image caption,

Dmitry Rogozin (in white) landed on an Arctic ice floe in April defying a Norwegian ban

Denmark's claim is on behalf of Greenland, an autonomous Danish territory.

Earlier this year, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin opened a Russian drifting base on an Arctic ice floe, in defiance of a Norwegian travel ban.

A deal barring fishing was almost completed last year, but Russia's annexation of Ukraine's Crimea peninsula in March 2014 brought talks to a halt.

'Resource extraction'

US officials said that although commercial fishing in the region was not likely to take place in the near future, a "precautionary approach" was necessary.

The five countries had agreed to allow fishing in the area "only once one or more international mechanisms are in place to manage any such fishing in accordance with recognised international standards", a US statement said, external.

Norwegian Foreign Minister Boerge Brende said in a statement, external that it was important to persuade other states not part of the deal not to fish in central Arctic Ocean.

Environmental group Greenpeace welcomed the agreement but complained it was not permanent, accusing most of the countries involved of being motivated by resource extraction as well as fishing, rather than protection.