SNP will not back Matheson ban over £11,000 iPad bill

The SNP will not back a parliamentary ban for ex-health secretary Michael Matheson, it has emerged, after First Minister John Swinney sparked confusion over his party's position.

The standards committee had recommended that Mr Matheson - who racked up an £11,000 bill on his parliamentary iPad - be banned from parliament for 27 sitting days and have his salary withdrawn for 54 days.

BBC Scotland News understands the SNP will call for a review of the complaints process, arguing it was open to bias and prejudice, and will not back the final motion when it comes to the vote at Holyrood later.

However, all other Holyrood parties are expected to vote in favour of the sanctions. If all 65 opposition MSPs voted in favour, Mr Matheson would be guaranteed to face the full 27-day ban.

Mr Swinney - who describes Mr Matheson as a friend - initially said he would not vote for the sanction due to concerns the process had been "prejudiced".

He faced losing the vote when the Scottish Greens confirmed they would back the proposed punishment and oppose any attempt to reduce it.

SNP deputy first minister Kate Forbes subsequently lodged an amendment that complained about the process but did not attempt to change the sanction.

On Wednesday morning the first minister told BBC Scotland News his opinion had not changed.

“I won’t be supporting the sanctions that are put in place," he said.

"Our position will be put to parliament today and parliament will hear all about that.”

There’s been confusion about what position the SNP would take with regards to sanctions for Michael Matheson.

Last week John Swinney said the process had been “prejudiced” and that he wouldn’t back the proposed punishment for his SNP colleague.

Last night the SNP’s amendment to the motion to be debated was published. They didn’t try and alter the sanction facing Mr Matheson.

And the indication then came from the party that SNP MSPs would actually back the punishment, albeit while complaining about the process.

But that’s shifted again this morning, with John Swinney telling the BBC that he will not back the ultimate sanctions. Though he’s been a bit vague about this in other interviews.

We’ll get a clearer picture of what’s going on in parliament this afternoon. But there’s no denying this has been a confusing 24 hours or so, when the SNP would rather have been focusing on the small matter of a general election.

Mr Matheson - who quit the cabinet in February ahead of a parliamentary report finding he had breached expenses rules - said last week he believed the fairness of the standards committee process had been compromised.

He is also the subject of a Scottish Conservative motion calling on him to resign from Holyrood.

The SNP amendment is critical that a Conservative member of the Standards Committee, Annie Wells, made “public pronouncements” about Mr Matheson previously.

It expresses regret at leaks to the media and calls for parliament’s corporate body to conduct an independent review of the complaints process.

Referring to Ms Wells, Mr Swinney told the BBC: “I think the integrity of the Scottish Parliament has been damaged by the way this process has been handled.

“In no other walk of life would it be acceptable for a disciplinary panel to have in its membership someone who had prejudged the case.”

Opposition MSPs outnumber the SNP group by 65 to 63, meaning the first minister would have been unable to prevent parliament from endorsing the punishment if they had all backed it.

The SNP government amendment could pass with the support of the Greens. However, SNP MSPs are expected to either abstain or vote against the final motion to recommend sanctions.

Michael Matheson resigned from the government in February following a scandal over his expenses

The Greens backed the sanctions against Mr Matheson but also raised concerns about the process.

The Scottish Conservative motion calling for Mr Matheson to quit will be debated later on Wednesday.

It accuses Mr Matheson of misusing taxpayer funds and making misleading statements.

It is non-binding and is unlikely to pass after the Greens said they would not support it.

Mr Matheson has repeatedly said he will not stand down as an MSP.

If agreed by MSPs, the ban and salary penalty would come into force from Thursday.

Mr Matheson but would be barred from all proceedings in the chamber and committees, but not from the parliamentary estate.

That sanction, applying only to sitting days, would last until early September, when MSPs return from summer recess.

iPad scandal

A £10,941.74 bill was racked up on his parliamentary iPad during a family holiday to Morocco between December 2022 and January 2023.

It was agreed with parliament that the bill would be paid out of the public purse, including £3,000 from his own office cost allowance.

When details of the bill were first reported in November 2023, Mr Matheson blamed the bill on an out of date sim card and insisted the device had been used exclusively for constituency work.

Following days of speculation he told parliament his sons had used the iPad to set up a wifi hotspot. He apologised and agreed to pay the bill personally and in full.

He quit as health secretary in February after more than nine years in cabinet ahead of the publication of a report by the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (SPCB), which found he had breached the MSPs code of conduct.

The SPCB report was then considered by the cross-party standards committee. Labour MSP Martin Whitfield, the committee convener, said the proposed sanctions reflected the seriousness of Mr Matheson’s breach of the MSP code of conduct.

“Had it not been for mitigatory factors, including the impact on the member and his family, the sanctions proposed would likely have been greater,” he said.

Douglas Ross sent a message to the first minister during a visit to Michael Matheson's constituency

After the committee's findings were announced last Thursday, the first minister raised concerns about the integrity of the process.

Mr Swinney revealed he had repeatedly written to Mr Whitfield referencing comments from committee member Annie Wells, who had initially recommended the 27-day suspension.

In a letter sent in March, Mr Swinney highlighted a post on X in which Ms Wells said Mr Matheson had "misled parliament and lied to the media repeatedly".

The 27-day suspension was backed by Tory colleague Oliver Mundell but SNP committee members Jackie Dunbar and Alasdair Allan disagreed with Mr Allan describing it as "extremely high" compared to sanctions in previous cases.

The deciding vote in favour was made by Mr Whitfield, who did not express a "personal view" but said the committee would otherwise have been unable to reach a recommendation.

By-election demands

Unlike at Westminster, where MPs can be removed by constituents if they are suspended for more than 10 days, there is no recall mechanism at Holyrood.

Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross tabled the motion declaring Mr Matheson should quit parliament and said a by-election could be held on 4 July, the same day as the general election.

He accused Mr Swinney of having "u-turned on his u-turn".

"It's scandalous that he wants to let the disgraced former health secretary off scot-free for lying to the public, press and parliament about his £11,000 iPad bill," mr Ross said.

Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said Mr Swinney was “trying to defend the indefensible”. "It's completely and utterly unacceptable,” he added.

Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton told BBC Scotland News that Mr Matheson should stand down and trigger a by-election having "lost the trust of the general public and the media".