A47 upgrade plans face High Court challenge

Campaigners against road development projects including the A47 outside the High Court
Image caption,

Environmental campaigners said schemes like the A47 would have an impact on the UK's ability to hit its carbon net zero targets by 2050

At a glance

  • Upgrade plans for the A47 around Norwich is being challenged in the High Court

  • An environmental campaigner is bringing the legal action

  • He said the overall impact of three separate schemes had not been assessed

  • National Highways said there was support for the plans

  • Published
Image caption,

There are plans to upgrade the A47 at several points along its route

Plans to upgrade parts of the A47 around Norwich are being challenged in the High Court over the affect they would have on reaching climate change targets.

Campaigner Andrew Boswell claims the government has not considered the full "cumulative" environmental impact of the three separate schemes.

He said that, if successful, his case could affect road building policy across the country.

National Highways said there was support for the A47 work but recognised the decision could be challenged.

Image caption,

Andrew Boswell said the environmental impact of all the upgrade plans needed to be considered together

Works to improve the road, external - between North Tuddenham and Easton, between Blofield and North Burlingham, and at the Thickthorn junction - have been on hold since December after a judge gave Dr Boswell leave to launch his judicial review.

Image caption,

National Highways is planning several improvements to the A47 - including three around Norwich

Opening the case, Dr Boswell’s barrister David Wolfe KC stressed that this action was not about questioning the transport secretary’s decision.

“The issue is how he applied the climate change implications of the A47 improvement programme,” he said.

He said ministers had a statutory obligation to assess the amount of carbon generated by every new project as part of the government’s commitment to reach net zero by 2050.

But he said the problem when assessing the impact of a scheme individually was that “the carbon baseline assumes that no additional infrastructure [in the area] is built".

He said figures were gathered showing the cumulative impact of all three schemes but they were not included in the final summary shown to the transport secretaries Grant Shapps and Anne-Marie Trevelyan before they approved the schemes.

The government is expected to outline its defence in the two-day hearing tomorrow.

Its legal team is expected to argue that ministers followed the law and took all relevant information into consideration.

Image source, Jenny Bates
Image caption,

Jenny Bates from Friends of the Earth hopes the legal challenge will be successful

Environmental groups hope that if Dr Boswell succeeds, the government will have to reconsider its plans to upgrade other roads across the country.

Jenny Bates, from Friends of the Earth, said: "If we carry on with the government’s massive road building programme we don’t stand a hope of meeting our net zero or air pollution targets.

"Transport is the single biggest sector for climate emissions and it is just incompatible to build more and more roads which generate new extra traffic."

National Highways said there had been a lot of local support for the A47 work, but it recognised the rights of individuals to challenge the government’s decisions.

A spokesman said: "We set ourselves tough targets in terms of lowering corporate carbon emissions and making sure that our future projects lead to an increase in local biodiversity."

At the end of the hearing, the judge, Mrs Justice Thornton, was expected to reserve judgement, which would be handed down in a few months' time.

Find BBC News: East of England on Facebook, externalInstagram, external and Twitter, external. If you have a story for us, email eastofenglandnews@bbc.co.uk, external