Hillsborough review criticises delays faced by families

Ninety-seven football fans died following the the 1989 disaster at Hillsborough stadium in Sheffield

Families of people killed in the Hillsborough disaster waited more than 23 years for face-to-face meetings to discuss the findings of their post mortems, a review found.

The investigation found the loved ones of Manchester Arena bombing victims also faced lengthy delays.

The report, by forensic expert Glenn Taylor and published by the Home Office, said bereaved families should be entitled to timely meetings and better communication.

A total of 97 people died as a result of the Hillsborough disaster of 1989, while 22 people were killed when a suicide bomber detonated a device at the Manchester Arena in 2017.

Paul Price, whose partner Elaine McIver died in the Arena attack, did not meet with the pathologist who carried out her post-mortem until 2023, and the meeting would not have happened if the review had not intervened.

The review was set up to examine what went wrong with the original pathology report into the deaths of Liverpool fans at 15 April 1989 FA Cup semi-final.

It was aimed at ensuring similar mistakes were not made in the future, the Home Office said.

The review followed a recommendation in a report by Bishop James Jones in 2017.

Overseen by the Home Office and commissioned by the Pathology Delivery Board, it was chaired by forensic science expert Glenn Taylor.

The original inquests, which were quashed by the High Court in 2012, heard no evidence from after 15:15 BST on 15 April 1989, the day of the disaster at the Hillsborough ground in Sheffield.

'Deeply personal'

That decision was based on pathology evidence that all the victims had suffered the injuries which caused their deaths before that time.

However, the subsequent Hillsborough Independent Panel found the evidence was flawed and it was highly likely that what happened after 15:15 - the time when the first ambulance arrived on the pitch - was significant in determining whether the victims could have survived.

In his 2017 report, called The Patronising Disposition Of Unaccountable Power, Bishop James Jones said: "It is difficult to overstate the impact of the failures of pathology at the first inquest.

"The impact is deeply personal for those families who feel they will now never know how their loved one died, but it also has a wider resonance - leading as it did to the necessity for new inquest proceedings 25 years after the disaster occurred."

The review's terms of reference included recognising the failures in pathology, assessing whether there was a risk of similar failings being made again, and considering if there were lessons learned which could be built into the development of Home Office-registered forensic pathologists and the wider provision of pathology services.

Ninety-seven football fans died as a result of the 1989 Hillsborough disaster

In the report, Mr Taylor, who died in August but had recorded a video message which was played to families before publication, said: "Our initial finding, as soon as we were able to listen to the Hillsborough and Manchester Arena families, was that it is the experience of bereaved families, not just the technical competence of pathologists, which calls for a fresh focus.

"As we have received evidence for our review and listened to both the relevant professionals and families affected, this assessment has resonated throughout: we have moved a long way since 1989 but more still needs to be done."

His report also recommended a process for informing family members of the existence of post-mortem photographs and images.

Jenni Hicks, whose daughters Sarah, 19, and Vicki, 15, were among the 97 victims at Hillsborough, told the review she learnt post-mortem images of their genitalia and breasts had been kept on a police computer.

She said: "How undignified and disrespectful for them, and shockingly embarrassing for me. When I later asked how many male police officers had viewed my daughters' bodies, there was no log to confirm this figure."

In the review, Hillsborough families said they had been told their loved ones' bodies were "property of the coroner" following their deaths.

Twenty-two people were killed in the attack by suicide bomber Salman Abedi in May 2017

Mr Taylor said: "Families bereaved through the Manchester Arena bombing have not reported to us the use of the phrase 'property of the coroner'. But the damage caused through any clumsy use of language is very apparent."

The comparison of post-mortem reports from the Hillsborough disaster and the Manchester Arena attack showed significant progress in the quality and depth of reports, the review found.

The report recommended that survivability was considered as part of forensic post-mortem examinations in mass fatalities where it was likely to be an issue.

It also recommended the number of forensic pathology trainees should be reinstated to eight, from the current number of six, and that there was a need for greater public understanding on the nature of the way pathology is conducted.

In a statement, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said she had written to the chair of the Pathology Delivery Board to ask that actions identified in the report were taken forward immediately.

She said: "I want to pay tribute to the families who have been through so much over the years and who gave their time and shared again the most difficult and unimaginable experiences they went through in order to inform this report.

"I can confirm we will be accepting all of the report's recommendations, which we will work at pace to deliver.

"This report is a stark reminder of the extent to which the families were failed and this government is committed to helping right the wrongs."

The Home Office announced in 2022 it had established an independent review to consider what went wrong with the original pathology report into the deaths at the 1989 FA Cup semi-final, and ensure similar mistakes were not made in the future.

The announcement initially sparked anger when it emerged families of those who died had not been told about it.

The review followed a recommendation in a report by Bishop James Jones

The review was one of 25 recommendations made by former bishop of Liverpool the Right Rev James Jones in his 2017 report The Patronising Disposition of Unaccountable Power.

He said: "The test of today's report will be whether it leads to changes ensuring that the pain and suffering of the Hillsborough families are never repeated.

"I call upon the new government to ensure that the changes in the role of pathology that are recommended in this report are made for the future."

The Conservative government responded to his report last year and said it had signed up to a Hillsborough Charter, pledging to place the public interest above its own reputation, but stopped short of introducing a "Hillsborough Law" incorporating a legal duty of candour.

Labour committed to the legislation in its first King's Speech in earlier this year.