No refunds in historic miscarriage of justice cases

Paul Blackburn outside The Royal Courts of Justice in May 2005Image source, PA Media
Image caption,

Paul Blackburn is one of those told they will not be refunded money docked from their payouts

  • Published

Victims of historic miscarriages of justice have been told by the government they must have "bed and board" costs for the time they spent in prison deducted from their compensation payments.

Last year the Conservative Justice Secretary, Alex Chalk, scrapped the policy of making such deductions from all future payouts.

That followed the high-profile case of Andrew Malkinson who was wrongfully imprisoned for 17 years.

The issue of past cases was left undecided.

But the government has now said people who have already had payouts cannot claim back money retrospectively.

Among those who have been told they will not be refunded money docked from their compensation payments is Paul Blackburn.

Aged 15 he was wrongfully convicted of the attempted murder of another boy and he spent 25 years in prison.

The Court of Appeal said police had fabricated evidence.

When he received compensation in 2011, more than £100,000 was deducted to cover rent and food costs he would have had to pay if he had been a free man.

Last year, after outrage over the case of Mr Malkinson, the policy of clawing back money was stopped.

Some involved in historic cases said it should apply to them too.

But the government has written to Mr Blackburn’s solicitors to say it is an established principle that changes in policy do not apply retrospectively, so he and others cannot claim back money already deducted.

Mr Blackburn says that is "morally wrong" and his solicitors may bring a legal challenge.

"It’s just compounding things isn’t it?" he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

"Just do the right thing. Just put things right."

He explained that his compensation was also calculated on the assumption that he would never have worked and would have received benefits.

"That’s punishing me twice," he said. "I had no employment record because you stole my life."

The BBC understands the previous justice secretary who originally decided to change the policy, Mr Chalk, was still considering what to do about historic cases at the time of July's election and trying to understand the scale of the compensation payouts that might follow.

Labour peer Lord Falconer, who served as justice secretary under Sir Tony Blair, said the current situation was an "absolute outrage" and the government should pay back deductions in cases where compensation had already been settled.

Matt Foot, co-director of legal charity Appeal, described the previous compensation deductions as "vindictive".

He told the Today programme there are "relatively low numbers" of people in the same situation as Mr Blackburn and the amount of money they are seeking compensation for is "relatively small".

However, Paymaster General Nick Thomas-Symonds said it was a "standard approach" that changes to government policy do not apply retrospectively.

"Whenever you change policy there’s going to end up being a cut off point in it," he told Today.

"But it is absolutely crucial that people do have the chance to rebuild their lives and that’s exactly what this government is committed to."

Image source, PA Media
Image caption,

Andrew Malkinson was jailed in 2004

Mr Malkinson, whose case sparked the policy change, served nearly two decades in prison for a rape he did not commit and was formally cleared by the Court of Appeal last July.

He has called for an overhaul of the jury and appeals system to give wrongly convicted people more protections.

Mr Malkinson said that even with the living costs rule removed, he expected to wait two years for any compensation while the independent board which determined how much he was entitled to made its decision.

Calling for the system to be speeded up and requirements to be simplified, he said: "It's a silly barrier that's been artificially erected... it's inexcusable. It's not justified."

A House of Commons library document, external from 2015 describes compensation as "the exception rather than the rule" in miscarriage of justice cases.

Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It’ll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.