Have Leicester improved under Van Nistelrooy?published at 12:14 20 February
Arnav Bhatia
Fan writer


It's a grim period for Leicester City.
The former Premier League champions seem destined for their second relegation in three years, and the disconnect between fans and the club has never been greater.
There was much excitement when legendary striker Ruud van Nistelrooy was named Steve Cooper's successor. Van Nistelrooy had fared reasonably well in his managerial career, but the Leicester board were gambling on a largely inexperienced manager to steer them to safety.
Two months into his appointment, the gamble appears to have failed. Leicester sit 19th in the league standings, and have managed just two victories in the 13 league games Van Nistelrooy has managed.
Statistically, Van Nistelrooy is performing worse than Cooper in some key metrics. Leicester have managed fewer goals scored (0.75 per game vs Cooper's 1.25), expected goals (0.87xG vs 1.01) and have conceded more (2.33 vs 1.92).
However, a closer look at other statistics such as xG, shots taken, and final-third touches show Leicester's creativity hasn't dipped much. The attackers were overperforming their xG under Cooper, and that overachievement has simply balanced out under Van Nistelrooy. Still, the number is low. Leicester need to create more chances, and Facundo Buonanotte's lack of minutes is not helping.
Van Nistelrooy has given Leicester an identity, and performances – especially from the midfield – have been good. Defensive issues and individual errors persist, though, and the lack of signings in January, alongside injuries to key players, makes his job even more challenging.
While a more experienced manager may have fared better, it's hard to fault Van Nistelrooy entirely. A manager can only do so much. The players have escaped accountability far too many times, especially under Cooper's tenure, and they now need to step up and find the spark to inspire Leicester to another great escape.
