Your Forest Premier League XIpublished at 16:43 GMT 17 November
16:43 GMT 17 November
We have, roughly, run the numbers and here is the XI your submissions have produced.
Three fifths of Nottingham Forest's watertight defence from last season has been joined by club legend Stuart Pearce and penalty-saving expert Mark Crossley in a backline that should prove tough to breach.
In midfield, do not expect Morgan Gibbs-White to play rigidly on the left, but he needed fitting in alongside a combative and destructive pairing of Roy Keane and Elliot Anderson.
Up front, Stan Collymore was a shoo-in but finding a partner proved tricky. Chris Wood's heroics in 2024-25 no doubt helped sway the vote.
Maybe get Brian Clough in charge of this bunch - or Nuno Espirito Santo? - and watch them shoot up the league.
'Know how to use the noise and scrutiny'published at 12:56 GMT 17 November
12:56 GMT 17 November
Nicola Pearson BBC Sport journalist
Image source, Getty Images
The statistics might say playing at home is an advantage - but what happens when it is not?
So far this season, 53% of Premier League matches have been won by the home team - the highest ever rate in a single campaign.
On the flip side, just 26% have been won by the away team - the lowest rate since 2010-11.
However, this has not been the case for all teams.
For some, being on the road has been more favourable. Tottenham are perhaps the most contrasting example having the joint-most points away from home with 13, but the second-worst in front of their own fans with just five points.
In the second part of her chat with BBC Sport, performance psychologist Marie Cartwright explained: "With crowds when playing away from home, there is a reduced scrutiny as a whole for away teams in that those crowds expect the home team to be the ones in charge. The players feel less judged. The pressure is on the other side.
"Another reason could come down to something in psychology I like to call simplification of the task. The team has a better collective identity when they are away.
"The human brain still goes back to the cavemen days. We have to, as a collective, fight for something. We have to protect our name. It goes back to that hunter-gatherer-against-danger mentality.
"When players are in front of a home crowd, there can be a bit of playing up to the individuality.
"I really do believe that collective identity has a strong enough influence because it amplifies the purpose and the belonging - let's belong together, let's be stronger together."
The focus might be on the players' performances being impacted by being home or away, but what about the managers?
Wolves, West Ham and Nottingham Forest make up three of the bottom four for their home records so far this term, and all have changed their manager in recent weeks.
"100% managers and coaches can be affected, and sometimes even more so because there is so much riding on that one person," Cartwright said.
"The decision-making is the main thing. The crowd is chanting - 'take this player off, do this' - and it can lead to rushed decisions, particularly when the noise becomes relentless.
"Then there is the emotional regulation and touchline behaviour. A manager is pacing up and down, mirroring the stress state, and players see that. It can lead to mimicking and players feeling that stress too."
The impact on teams psychologically playing home or away is apparent, so how can they make the most from these different conditions?
"Our brains are wired to think negatively - it's a protection mechanism," Cartwright said.
"So when it comes to performing home and away, those players and managers who deal with it best are those who know how to use the noise and scrutiny and move on quickly from it - an ability to have a reset routine and regulate their emotions in these pressurised situations."
Stadium or state of mind? Psychologist on home advantagepublished at 15:28 GMT 16 November
15:28 GMT 16 November
Nicola Pearson BBC Sport journalist
Image source, Getty Images
"Home advantage gives you an advantage."
It is a quote - among many - attributed to the famous former England manager Sir Bobby Robson - a simple, yet fair reflection of a historical format of football.
For as long as teams have played in leagues, games taking place home and away has been the norm, with the idea that playing at home will be to the benefit of that team.
But what is the impact of playing at your own ground in front of your own fans?
In the first part of her chat with BBC Sport, performance psychologist Marie Cartwright explained: "Home impact can be viewed in two ways. Sometimes it does have a positive impact, and what happens is there is an elevated motivation.
"What that means is the crowd energy increases adrenaline and that creates a momentum in effort and intensity in the players. It is also a familiar environment for the players, so that means it reduces the cognitive load. They don't have to think as much about anything else other than their play because they know the pitch, they know the routines, they feel settled.
"However, there are a couple of potential negative impacts as well, with the potential intensification in pressure in the home fans, most times, expecting dominance from the home team. That can lead to mistakes from players feeling bigger to them.
"There can then be what we call a threat state. The players might perceive consequences as high, so they feel they might be facing more criticism when they are at home."
While those who watch football know there are more factors than just where the match is being to take into consideration, the statistics do suggest the influence is there.
Since the Premier League started, the home win percentage has outweighed the away win percentage in all bar one season - the Covid-hit 2020-21 campaign in which fans were largely not allowed admission saw a 38% home win rate compared to 40% away win rate.
So how a team handles this additional crowd pressure seems to be a key factor.
"In psychology, there is something called the challenge and threat theory," Cartwright said.
"In reality what that means is a 'challenge state' can push the player into thinking, 'I've got this, I've got the resources to cope with this'. That leads to better decision making and quicker reactions.
"The threat state, on the other hand, players might think the consequences outweigh their ability to cope. In any match context, that can mean they have a narrow sense of focus, the focus is not quite the same, so the play becomes slower because of overthinking."
"It can also be called 'red brain or blue brain' - with red brain being the one with fear-based dialogue and internal negative self-talk, while blue brain is the cool, calm and collected one that can handle its emotions.
"What sits in the middle of these is distraction. How a player responds to distraction and filters out the noise, like the crowd, can impact which of these mindsets they move into and ultimately how the team performs."
Read more from Marie in part two of her chat about why teams some teams play better away from home and how it impacts managers - that will be on this page early next week.
Beasant? Van Hooijdonk? Elanga? Your Forest Premier League XIspublished at 09:42 GMT 15 November
09:42 GMT 15 November
Here's another clutch of selections for your best Premier League XI.
See what you make of them.
Craig: 5-3-2. Navas, Aina, Walker, Milenkovic, Murillo, Pearce, Keane, Anderson, Gibbs-White, Collymore, Van Hooijdonk. Love to see Psycho in a wing-back position with Aina on right. Could Collymore and Van Hooijdonk play together?
Matthew: 4-4-2. Henderson, Pearce, Walker, Milenkovic, Williams, Keane, Anderson, Bohinen, Clough, Collymore, Elanga. Mixture of old and new. Intelligence, skill and pace.
Mark: 4-4-2. Crossley (if only Samba!), Pearce, Walker, Milenkovic, Aina, Keane, Clough, Anderson, Woan, Collymore, Van Hooijdonk - despite his strike, he was brilliant at free-kicks! Solid defence for sure with a mix of creative ability and combative midfield with quite a few goals too. Collymore is the best striker we've had in the Premier League era.
Terry: 4-2-3-1. Crossley, Williams, Walker, Murillo, Pearce, Anderson, Keane, Stone, Gibbs-White, Roy, Collymore. Walker and Psycho with Williams and Murillo. No goals conceded and with Anderson and Keane holding, no-one is getting through. Then MGW, Stone and Roy supplying the greatest striker we've had. Goals galore.
Martin: 4-4-1-1. Beasant, Williams, Murillo, Milenkovic, Pearce, Bohinen, Stone, Woan, Gibbs-White, Collymore, Roy. The mid 1990s squad were amazing going forward. The defence now is stronger.
Doug: 4-4-2. Sels, Williams, Walker, Milenkovic, Pearce, Keane, Anderson, Stone, Woan, Collymore, Clough. So many quality players to choose from but reliability and class had to be the top priority.
Do clubs get compensated for players injured on international duty?published at 09:12 GMT 15 November
09:12 GMT 15 November
George Mills BBC Sport senior journalist
In a recent addition of the Football Extra newsletter, Roger asked BBC Sport: Players are frequently injured on international duty - such as Chris Wood for New Zealand last season, which may have ultimately cost Nottingham Forest a Champions League place. Are clubs compensated by the country or does insurance cover compensation?'
Since 2012, Fifa's Club Protection Programme has covered the salary of players injured on international duty - although there are some conditions.
Firstly, the player must be out of action for a period of at least 28 consecutive days and the injury must have been sustained during an "accident", which is defined in very boring and legally-specific detail in Fifa's guidelines, though it covers most of the examples you could think of.
The scheme pays the salary of an injured player up to the maximum amount of €7.5m (£6.6m) until they are declared fit to return for their clubs.
Transfermarkt lists Chris Wood as missing 18 days - three games - with the hip injury you mention from last March, suffered on international duty with New Zealand. As he returned inside 28 days, Forest would not have been eligible to claim compensation.
There are a couple of clubs who will currently be beneficiaries of this scheme though, including Newcastle United, whose £55m summer signing Yoane Wissa is yet to make an appearance since suffering a knee injury while playing for DR Congo.