A US deal sounds good but it is all about the detailpublished at 12:48 British Summer Time
Faisal Islam
Economics editor
The real question about positive comments by Vice-President JD Vance about a UK-US trade deal, is what he actually means by the term "deal".
Just after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's visit to the White House in February, it was rather telling that the UK delegation referred to what was being negotiated as an "economic deal". This was meant to show that this "deal" was not about an extensive free trade agreement, covering nearly all goods.
This time around, the "deal" seems to have been about science, technology and artificial intelligence cooperation in return for avoiding tariffs. However, there is a big problem now.
The US has now levied a 10% tax on UK imports as part of what it called its "reciprocal tariffs". But there is no general problem with this trading relationship. In fact, the UK buys more from the US than the other way around.
The mood music from Washington is that this 10% tariff is not for negotiation with anyone. That is the baseline tariff that has been levied on nearly all of America's trading partners.
But the UK is in a different position than other nations.
Most countries had faced higher tariffs - as illustrated on Donald Trump's big board - such as on electronics manufacturers in East Asia and they want to keep the levy at the 10% rate.
The net result is that the UK may not have much to negotiate here, and yet is being treated very harshly, given there is no US trade deficit.
Factor in the exemptions for electronics which benefit likes of China and the fact that cars, a major industry for Britain, are being tariffed at 25% and the UK side has much to complain about.