Summary

  • Australian woman Erin Patterson, is being cross-examined by the prosecution in her murder trial - three people died after eating a beef Wellington lunch at her house, while another became ill, but survived

  • The prosecution says Ms Patterson deliberately included poisonous mushrooms in a meal she served to guests – she denies this and her defence team says it was a "terrible accident"

  • The court has seen photos from Ms Patterson's phone, which the prosecution suggest show her calculating a lethal dose of death cap mushrooms - something Ms Patterson denied

  • Ms Patterson was also asked why in the days after the lunch she repeatedly lied to police about owning a food dehydrator, and said it was a "stupid knee-jerk reaction"

  • She also told the court her interactions with her husband were "strained", and that when her guests fell ill she became scared she might be to blame

Media caption,

Watch: Three things you need to know about Australia's mushroom murder trial

  1. Talk about changing schoolspublished at 02:00 BST 6 June

    Prosecutor Nanette Rogers now suggests to Ms Patterson that she moved the children to a new school in term three of 2023 without telling their father, Simon.

    "That's not true," she replies, saying she had told her estranged husband months earlier.

    Dr Rogers later reads a Facebook message where Ms Patterson writes that if Simon wants to "walk away from his responsibilities", then she wants to be able to choose the children's schools herself, which she described as a "blessing in disguise".

  2. Slow moving start to the morningpublished at 01:58 BST 6 June

    Katy Watson
    reporting from Morwell

    This line of questioning continues, and Ms Patterson keeps asking the prosecutor to repeat herself, or clarify her queries.

    “I’m not trying to be difficult,” says Erin Patterson, adding she just wants to understand the question.

    “Do you understand the word dispute?” asks the prosecutor.

  3. Questioning begins with school fees disputepublished at 01:56 BST 6 June

    Simon Atkinson
    reporting from Morwell

    Erin Patterson is being asked about a dispute with her estranged husband about school fees - and what the prosecution says was an attempt to get her in-laws involved.

    "I suggest to you that you were seeking to get Don and Gail to influence Simon to pay half the school fees," asks prosecutor Dr Rogers. “Agree or disagree?”

    Erin Patterson pauses, then responds: “I was trying to ask Don and Gail to help Simon and [me] communicate about this better".

    “That’s not my question,” says Dr Rogers.

    “Then the answer to your question is no,” says Ms Patterson.

    After a tense exchange with the prosecutor, Ms Patterson concedes that Don Patterson did not want to get involved in the issue, but says she “wasn’t angry” about that.

  4. Court full as Ms Patterson's evidence continuespublished at 01:41 BST 6 June

    Katy Watson
    reporting from Morwell

    Ian Wilkinson, the only survivor of that lunch, once again is in court watching Erin Patterson’s testimony.

    He has attended this trial throughout, often accompanied by his daughter.

    There was a bit of a queue outside the courthouse this morning too, with members of the public keen to watch Ms Patterson give evidence. Some are now regular faces, very interested in sitting in court and following this case.

  5. What you missed earlier in the weekpublished at 01:37 BST 6 June

    Monday

    • Erin Patterson made her first appearance since the trial started in late April, telling the court about marital problems with her then-husband Simon Patterson and the feeling she was being cut off from the wider Patterson family
    • She also spoke about the traumatic birth of her first child, saying she discharged herself from hospital early after the emergency caesarean against medical advice

    Tuesday

    • The court heard about Ms Patterson’s long-standing love of mushrooms and how in early 2020, she started foraging wild fungi as a hobby
    • She apologised for a series of expletive-laden Facebook messages in a private group chat that were critical of her in-laws and estranged husband
    • She also said the mushrooms used in the meal were a mix of store-bought mushrooms and some bought from a Melbourne shop months earlier

    Wednesday

    • Ms Patterson said she only ate a small portion of her meal at the fatal lunch because she was busy talking and later ate two-thirds of a cake before throwing up
    • She claimed her lies about having cancer were to cover up her embarrassment over plans to get weight-loss surgery
    • She admitted that there was a possibility that foraged mushrooms stored in her pantry may have been added to the meal unintentionally
    • There were no assigned seats or plates at the lunch, Ms Patterson said
    • Hours after the meal, and after she had thrown up her food, she started feeling ill too and later took herself to hospital
    • She said she done several factory resets on her phone in the days after the lunch to prevent police seeing her collection of mushroom photos

  6. Hello from Morwellpublished at 01:33 BST 6 June

    Simon Atkinson
    reporting from Morwell

    Welcome to day 5, week 6 of the trial of Erin Patterson.

    For the first five weeks the accused was in the dock but has spent most of this week in the witness box.

    And that’s where she will be today too.

    It’ll be a shorter grilling of Ms Patterson today though.

    As is usual for this trial, it is an early finish on Fridays, and for everyone involved, there'll be a longer break than usual this weekend. Monday is a public holiday here in the state of Victoria and the court will be closed.

    Today the BBC has been allocated (by ballot) one of the six media seats in the courtroom. Stay with us for the latest in this trial that is gripping Australia.

  7. What happened yesterdaypublished at 01:24 BST 6 June

    Erin Patterson was cross-examined by the prosecution for much of Thursday. Here is what happened:

    • Ms Patterson said lying to police about having a food dehydrator and foraging mushrooms was a "stupid knee-jerk reaction" as she was "scared" they would blame her for making the lunch guests sick
    • She claimed all six individual beef Wellingtons she made were the same and said she did not intentionally put death cap mushrooms in the dish
    • Under cross-examination, Ms Patterson denied she dumped a food dehydrator used to prepare the meal because she it was evidence she knowingly poisoned her relatives
    • The prosecution put to Ms Patterson that images of mushrooms - which they claim were death caps - on a scale in her kitchen prove she was researching the ideal "fatal dose" to feed her guests - Ms Patterson denied that claim
    • The court also heard about disagreements between Ms Patterson and her estranged husband over finances in the months leading up to the fatal lunch
    • Prosecutors suggested to Ms Patterson that she believed her lies about having cancer would never been found out because she knew the lunch guests would soon be dead, to which Ms Patterson said: "That's not true."
    • Ms Patterson's use of emojis was also brought up with prosecutors accusing her of mocking her in-laws religiosity with "eye-roll" emojis - Ms Patterson said they simply reflected her frustration
    • The judge also told the court that the trial, now in its sixth week, will likely continue for several more
  8. What is the triple murder trial about?published at 01:20 BST 6 June

    This case centres around a lunch that Erin Patterson hosted at her Leongatha home in regional Victoria in July 2023.

    Her in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, both 70, died in the days after they ate Ms Patterson's home-cooked beef Wellington which had poisonous death cap mushrooms in it.

    Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, 66, also died while her husband, local pastor Ian Wilkinson, 71, survived after spending weeks in an induced coma.

    Ms Patterson - facing three murder charges and one of attempted murder - has denied she purposely poisoned the four guests with her defence team calling it a tragic accident. The prosecution, though, argues she deliberately served the toxic meal.

    A flowchart showing the lunch guests and how they relate to each other
  9. Day two of Erin Patterson's cross-examination beginspublished at 01:18 BST 6 June

    Tiffanie Turnbull
    LIve editor

    Welcome back to our live coverage of the trial of Erin Patterson, who is accused of killing three relatives and gravely injuring another by intentionally serving them a toxic mushroom meal.

    The 50-year-old denies this, saying it was all a tragic accident. She has been giving evidence since Monday afternoon.

    Much of yesterday was spent with the intense cross-examination of Ms Patterson by the prosecution, Dr Nanette Rogers.

    Today, the BBC has been given one of the rare places inside the court room, where cross-examination is set to continue.

    We will be bringing you updates as they happen throughout the day.