What's the case all about?published at 13:28 British Summer Time 2 July
Cachella Smith
Reporting from the High Court
The start of these proceedings tracks back to a man, known publicly as X, who served as an informant for MI5.
A BBC investigation published in 2022 found X had used his position as a means to terrorise his partner, known as Beth. Video evidence showed him threatening to kill her and attacking her with a machete.
The government had sought to block publication of this – failing to do so completely although succeeding in preventing publication of the man’s identity, which is why we call him X.
During these proceedings, and those brought by Beth, MI5 told three separate courts that it had stuck to its core secrecy policy of neither confirming nor denying X was a state agent.
However, the BBC in February produced notes and phone call recordings proving MI5 had disclosed the man’s status to them during attempts to prevent its investigation into the matter. It meant the agency had given false evidence in court.
The agency has since issued an "unreserved apology" – calling what happened a "serious error".
And that brings us to where we are now, and a situation that has raised questions about the reliability of MI5's evidence to courts generally as well as their policy of neither confirming nor denying the identity of who works for them.