Deal was 'flimsy' - Fallonpublished at 13:14 British Summer Time 9 May 2018
Iran statement
House of Commons
Parliament
Former defence secretary Sir Michael Fallon says that the agreement "should never have been called comprehensive" and was "flimsy" because it did not include missiles.
He says it has allowed the Iranian regime to interfere in Syria, Iraq and Yemen through new financial freedoms.
Mr Johnson says that he doesn't remember Mr Fallon making those points when he was defence secretary.
He says he disagrees with him because the advantage of the deal is that there is an idea at the heart of it to stop nuclear proliferation in exchange for limited economic benefits.
The Iranians are still in compliance with that agreement, he says.