Starmer: NI amendment makes 'no deal' Brexit impossiblepublished at 18:41 British Summer Time 13 June 2018
EU Withdrawal Bill
Earlier, during his speech, Sir Keir Starmer, the shadow Brexit secretary, said the inclusion of the Northern Ireland amendment in the EU Withdrawal Bill meant the only option was to now "reproduce the customs union and the single market" - effectively making a 'no deal' Brexit impossible.
The Northern Ireland amendment obliges the government to ensure that the Brexit agreement does not disrupt co-operation between the North and the Republic. This means there will not be any physical infrastructure on the Irish border, "including border posts, or checks and controls," Sir Keir says.
He added that the inclusion of the amendment also makes the maximum facilitation or "max fac" option - where new technology would be used to deal with cross-border trade - "unlawful". Max fac is Brexit Secretary David Davis's preferred option for dealing with the Irish border.
You can read more about the government's customs options here.
Tory pro-EU MPs supported the Labour frontbencher's view:
Heidi Allen, Conservative MP for South Cambridgeshire, said: "It's huge, it actually says I think logically we will have to come to a customs union agreement, partnership, love dance, don't care what you call it, that's what we will need to avoid any border to Northern Ireland."
Dominic Grieve also agreed, saying: "Not only will we have to stay in a form of customs arrangement amounting to a union, but we're also going to have to have a high level of regulatory alignment."
And Ken Clarke called the passing of the amendment "the most significant thing that happened yesterday".
Allow Twitter content?
This article contains content provided by Twitter. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. You may want to read Twitter’s cookie policy, external and privacy policy, external before accepting. To view this content choose ‘accept and continue’.
Allow Twitter content?
This article contains content provided by Twitter. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. You may want to read Twitter’s cookie policy, external and privacy policy, external before accepting. To view this content choose ‘accept and continue’.
What does the government say?
In response to a question from Labour's Chuka Umunna, who asked: "Does he [the solicitor general, Robert Buckland] accept that if we were to leave with no deal and we were trading on WTO rules, that under WTO rules would necessitate a border, therefore leaving with no deal is inconsistent with government policy as he has just stated it?" Mr Buckland replied: "I entirely agree: the government's policy is to achieve a deal because we are mindful of the points that he and others understand."