Back and forth arguments for seemingly tiny detailspublished at 20:06 British Summer Time 21 May
Kayla Epstein
Reporting from court
We've now turned to the matter of how to describe Michael Cohen in the jury instructions.
Trump's lawyer has requested that Justice Merchan use the phrase “participated in a crime” and for the name “Cohen" to be used. Prosecutors want him to say, "Cohen participated in and was convicted of two crimes” and to use the phrase “the accomplice”.
It might seem like they say the same thing. But, for legal reasons, the distinction does matter.
We go back and forth for several minutes, and in the end, the judge makes a small edit - they’re going to change “participated in a crime” to “crimes”, plural.
So many of these arguments are highly technical, but each possible adjustment or deviation opens doors in both teams' minds that could result in an unfavourable verdict.