Covid-19: Boris Johnson defends NHS Test and Trace after MPs' criticism

The NHS Test and Trace scheme in England was launched in May last year

Boris Johnson has defended the NHS Test and Trace programme after a scathing report from a committee of MPs.

The Public Accounts Committee said the scheme had failed to prevent lockdowns and there was "no clear evidence" that it had cut coronavirus infections.

And it said the cost - £37bn set aside over two years - was "staggering".

But the prime minister said it was thanks to NHS Test and Trace that schools and the economy can reopen and people can "restart their lives".

During Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday, Mr Johnson was asked why so much money had been spent on the system when the government said a 1% pay rise for NHS staff was all that it could afford.

"It is thanks to NHS Test and Trace that we're able to send kids back to school and begin cautiously and irreversibly to reopen our economy and restart our lives," he said.

He also defended the 1% pay rise, saying NHS workers were at least getting an increase, unlike other public sector workers.

• Inside NHS Test and Trace

• How do I get a coronavirus test?

• Is NHS Test and Trace working?

The cross-party Public Accounts Committee is in charge of scrutinising the value for money of government programmes and was looking at spending on NHS Test and Trace, which is run separately from the health service.

Spending on the programme amounted to £22bn in 2020-21 and another £15bn is budgeted for 2021-22.

The MP who chairs the committee, Meg Hillier, said it was hard to point to a "measurable difference" the programme had made and taxpayers should not be treated "like an ATM machine".

The committee's report warned of:

• An over-reliance on consultants, with some paid more than £6,600 a day

• A failure to be ready for the surge in demand for tests seen last September

• Never meeting its target to turn around tests done face-to-face within 24 hours

• Contact tracers only having enough work to fill half their time even when cases were rising

• A splurge on rapid tests with no clear evidence they will help

Earlier, government ministers and the programme's boss also defended the scheme.

Transport Secretary Grant Shapps said the MPs' report "defies logic", telling BBC Breakfast it was "thanks to Test and Trace" that UK cases of the variants first identified in South Africa and Brazil had been limited to 285 and six cases respectively.

"Yes, it's been very expensive... but I think the idea that we would be somehow better off without it is crazy," he said.

Baroness Dido Harding, head of the National Institute for Health Protection, which runs the system, pointed out it had been built from scratch and was now doing more tests than any other comparable country.

She said performance had been improving with more people who tested positive being reached and more of their close contacts being asked to isolate. "It is making a real impact in breaking the chains of transmission," she added.

How does Test and Trace spend the money?

Not all of the money has been allocated yet. But the bulk of it is going on the lab-based PCR testing system, which includes the hundreds of local testing centres and network of mega-labs across the UK to process the tests.

Some £10bn has been set aside for rapid testing, which is currently being used in schools in England as well as being sent to employers.

The money has also been used to set up the 12,000-strong national contact tracing team in England and support councils to run their own local teams. The devolved nations are responsible for contact tracing individually.

What are the committee's concerns?

The committee acknowledges significant investment was needed to set up the system at speed after the pandemic struck.

But it criticised an over-use of consultants, saying it needed to "wean itself off its persistent reliance on consultants" which were costing an average of £1,100 a day each, and some of whom had been paid more than £6,600 a day.

On last count, there were still 2,500 being used, the MPs said.

The complexity of the system was also laid bare with news that it had involved more than 400 contracts being signed with 217 different suppliers. Some 70% of the value of those contracts were directly awarded rather than being put out to tender.

But the MPs said the investment had helped to massively increase testing capacity.

When the pandemic started the UK could only process about 3,000 tests a day, but that had increased to more than 800,000 by January.

Meanwhile, the committee pointed out that while capacity has grown, the system has still never met its target to turnaround all tests in a face-to-face setting in 24 hours.

And it was found lacking at the crucial point in September when there was a surge in demand for testing.

By contrast, contact tracers have been under-used, with just half of time spent working on cases in October.

By January, contact tracers had been in touch with 2.5 million people testing positive and advised more than 4.5 million of their close contacts to self-isolate.

But it warned compliance with self-isolation seemed to be low.

It also raised concerns about the use of rapid on-the-spot tests. Pilots in Liverpool did not show "clear evidence" of a reduction in infection levels or hospital cases.

The reaction to the findings

Labour's Rachel Reeves said the report showed the system had "failed the British people" and underlined the "epic amounts of waste and incompetence" in the way Test and Trace had been set up and run.

Meanwhile, the head of the Royal College of Nursing, Dame Donna Kinnair said nurses "will be furious to hear of the millions of pounds being spent on private sector consultants".

And Dr Billy Palmer, of the Nuffield Trust think tank, added: "The promise of a world-beating test-and-trace system has just not materialised, and the eye-watering sums of public money poured into this system are set to increase even further."

He said despite the rollout of the vaccination programme, it would remain an important tool and urged ministers to do more to financially support people to isolate.