Farm laws: Indian unions reject offer to suspend reforms
- Published
Farmers' unions have rejected an Indian government offer to put controversial reforms on hold for 18 months.
The unions said the three new farm laws must be fully repealed, a move the government has ruled out.
Farmers have been camped on Delhi's outskirts since 26 November to protest against the laws, which will further open up agriculture to the free market.
The government had proposed setting up a joint committee to find an amicable solution to end the deadlock.
This followed several rounds of failed talks between the sides.
Talking to the media after the meeting, farmer group leaders said the government was ready to form a special panel to review demands for a minimum support price (MSP), and the laws.
But later on Thursday the Samyukt Kisan Morcha, an umbrella body of unions leading the protests, ruled out any deal.
"In a full general body meeting the proposal put forth by the government yesterday was rejected," a statement said.
"We will not go back without the repealing of these farm laws."
The government has said the reforms will not hurt farmers. But farm groups say the laws threaten decades-old concessions and subsidies they receive, thwart their bargaining power and expose them to the vagaries of the market and big corporate companies.
Earlier India's Supreme Court stayed the implementation of the laws "until further notice", and appointed an independent committee to broker a deal between the farmers and the government.
The farmers, however, have not accepted the committee, saying that all of its panel members are pro-government.
What exactly do the laws propose?
Taken together, the laws loosen rules around sale, pricing and storage of farm produce - rules that have protected India's farmers from the free market for decades.
One of the biggest changes is that farmers will be allowed to sell their produce at a market price directly to private players - agricultural businesses, supermarket chains and online grocers. Most Indian farmers currently sell the majority of their produce at government-controlled wholesale markets or mandis at assured floor prices.
The reforms give farmers the option of selling outside of this so-called "mandi system".
But it's unclear how this will play out in reality.
Farmers are mainly concerned that this will eventually lead to the end of wholesale markets and guaranteed prices, leaving them with no back-up option. If they are not satisfied with the price offered by a private buyer, they cannot return to the mandi or use it as a bargaining chip during negotiations.
Are these reforms necessary?
Most economists and experts agree that Indian agriculture desperately needs reform.
More than half of Indians work on farms, but the sector accounts for barely a sixth of the country's GDP. Declining productivity and a lack of modernisation have shrunk incomes and hobbled agriculture in India for decades..
The government, meanwhile, provides farmers with generous subsidies, exempts them from income tax and crop insurance, guarantees a minimum price for 23 crops and regularly waives debts.
But none of this seems to have helped Indian farming much as low incomes and debt continue to drive many farmers to poverty.
Related topics
- Published19 November 2021
- Published2 December 2020
- Published13 January 2021