FA to pay Forest after landmark legal casepublished at 18:42 BST 4 September
Sami Mokbel
Senior football correspondent

The FA will be forced to pay Nottingham Forest a significant sum after losing a landmark legal case with the Premier League club.
Forest faced disciplinary proceedings following their 2-0 defeat by Everton in April last year — a game that included three disputed penalty appeals — having posted on social media that they had warned the PGMOL that the VAR in the game, Stuart Attwell, was a supporter of relegation rivals Luton Town.
But Forest then complained that the barrister appointed to chair the disciplinary panel had been "biased" against them after the club questioned the £1m fine being sought by the FA.
Graeme McPherson KC had said at that hearing that he rejected "the club's somewhat hysterical submission".
However, lawyers have now found that McPherson's comment could be viewed as an "unjustified, inappropriate, and personal attack on the club" after they were fined £750,000 for the social media message, which was posted on platform X.
When Forest appealed the fine, McPherson was selected by the FA to chair the appeal.
However, Forest objected to that appointment because of his previous comments. McPherson eventually recused citing "pre-existing commitments".
But in October, the City Ground club were fined £125,000 for their part in a mass confrontation with Chelsea at Stamford Bridge, with their opponents also fined £40,000.
Forest appealed against that decision too, with McPherson once more appointed as the chair of the disciplinary panel.
The club argued that his appointment was inappropriate because of the "hysterical" remark and sought an arbitration hearing to resolve the issue.
And that hearing has agreed with Forest, concluding that this was "a case where apparent bias has been made out".
"There can be no doubt but that the description … as 'somewhat hysterical' can fairly be said to be, and would be seen by the notional fair-minded independent observer to be, an unjustified, inappropriate, and personal attack on the club and its legal representatives," the three-person panel, led by Kim Franklin KC, said.
McPherson contested Forest's view but the panel said his use of "hysterical" was "inherently highly pejorative".
A new chair of the panel for the appeal will have to be appointed, with the FA footing the legal bill.
The governing body will have to pay the cost of the tribunal, which was £105,750 plus VAT, and both its own and Forest's legal costs.