'Gutted to see him go' or 'good riddance' to Kudus?published at 09:59 BST 10 July

Image source, Getty ImagesWe asked for your views on Tottenham agreeing a £55m fee to sign Mohammed Kudus.
Here are some of your comments:
Leigh: It's good riddance as far as I'm concerned. Once he made it clear that he wanted to join Tottenham, there was no way back. And those stats don't tell the whole truth, he was bang average, lazy and uninterested for a large chunk of last season. Let's just hope the money is reinvested by Sullivan. I have my doubts.
Chris: Loved Kudus, so strong on the ball, took people on and created space for others. Only weakness maybe was releasing it at the right moment. The problem was he was best suited to the position where Jarrod Bowen excels. Gutted to see him go, especially to Spurs.
Mark: Sad news, great player. Our board cannot run a bath, let alone a club. Big hole to fill.
Neil: Most fans happy to see him go, but the price seems low. We just don't seem to be capable of keeping players happy so they want to stay or getting a good deal for them. Apart from Declan Rice, I cant think of anyone recently where it felt like we got a good price. Let's see if we can spend the money wisely.
James: Despite Kudus' dribbling stats, he struggled to have a positive impact on the game for us and he was often guilty of overplaying in the wrong areas of the pitch. So while he has so much potential, I don't think his loss will make or break our season. It'll be more important what we do with the funds from the sale.
Kenneth: Can never play Kudus in his best position as he isn't as good as Bowen. Seemed uninterested last season and if we use the money wisely we could do better. Never seemed loyal to the club and West Ham was always a stepping stone to take him further. Once Spurs can't offer Champions League football anymore, I'm sure he will lose interest there too.
John: Total joke. West Ham can't buy any players until they have let Kudus go and at such a ridiculously low price. If we want to compete at the top level, the board need to sell the club. Big stadium, small club, no future.
Glen: Very angry with the decision to sell at a cut price if there was a £85 million release clause. If he plays like his first season, Spurs have a great deal. My concern is by accepting the deal, how much debt are West Ham in? And how much money will Graham Potter be given to strengthen a weak squad? A relegation battle ahead for sure.





















