Russian GP: Lewis Hamilton wins after Sebastian Vettel ignores team orders

Lewis Hamilton was handed victory in the Russian Grand Prix after a virtual safety car cost Ferrari's Charles Leclerc the lead.

Hamilton's first win in four grands prix inched him closer to a sixth world title and came after Ferrari's chances of victory fell apart following a controversy over Leclerc's team-mate Sebastian Vettel disobeying team orders.

Ferrari's pre-race plan was for Leclerc to tow Vettel down into the first corner to remove the risk of Hamilton, starting second, taking the lead.

Leclerc played his side of the bargain, but once Vettel was in the lead, he refused a demand to let his team-mate back past him.

• What happened next? The power struggles that ended in departure

• 'This is Armageddon coming here at Ferrari'

• 'It's stupid to swap places'

• Vettel's defiance sparks intense battle for supremacy at Ferrari

Win number 82 for Hamilton, and his fourth in Russia

The Ferrari soap opera intensifies

After a series of conversations over the radio, Ferrari decided to do the swap later and Leclerc recovered first place when he was pitted four laps earlier and allowed to benefit from fresher tyres.

But Vettel's engine developed a problem in its hybrid system on his first lap out of the pits and when he was told to park the car, that led to the virtual safety car being deployed.

It was bad timing for Ferrari, because it meant Hamilton, who had been promoted into the lead by Ferrari's pit stops, could stop under the VSC and lose far less time than under racing conditions, allowing him to keep the lead.

Leclerc then lost second place as well when George Russell crashed with an apparent braking problem just as the VSC was ending, bringing out the safety car.

Ferrari decided to pit Leclerc again to swap his medium tyres for softs, the same as the Mercedes drivers, and that dropped him to third behind Hamilton's team-mate Valtteri Bottas.

Try as he might, Leclerc could not quite get close enough to attack Bottas, and Mercedes were able to deliver their first one-two since the British Grand Prix back in mid-July.

Hamilton scored an extra point for fastest lap and his championship lead is now at 73 points. Mathematically, he cannot win the title at the next race in Japan - but he could well do it the race after that in Mexico.

Vettel stopped at Turn 15 - had he limped to the pits Leclerc would not have lost the lead to Hamilton in the pits stops

Vettel sparks another controvesy

Losing the win was bad luck for Ferrari. There were questions as to whether they could have asked Vettel to make it back to the pits and avoided the VSC that looked to have cost them the race but team boss Mattia Binotto said that they had to ask him to stop for safety reason because the car had lost electrical insulation and they did not know the potential consequences.

The main issue will be the debate over Vettel's actions at the start of the race.

At the start, Leclerc seemed to have made a mistake in leaving the door open on the inside for Vettel into the first corner.

But a radio message within a couple of laps betrayed a pre-race plan, as Leclerc was told: "We are looking into doing the swap later in the race."

Sochi is not a track famed for its classic races, but drama from within Ferrari helps us overcome that

This was a reference to a pre-race plan that Leclerc would allow Vettel to draft past him, to secure first and second positions, before the German would then let Leclerc back past again.

After five laps, Leclerc was told: "Seb will let you by on the next lap."

But problems emerged when Vettel said: "I would have got him anyway."

Again Vettel was told to let Leclerc by, and again he objected, saying that they should tell Leclerc to go faster.

Leclerc got on the radio again to say: "You put me behind. I respect everything. We speak later."

Vettel was told a third time to let Leclerc by, but again nothing happened, and the team went on the radio to Leclerc to say: "We will do the swap later."

We've been here before, Sebastian: In 2013 Vettel refused to stay behind his team-mate Mark Webber at the Malaysian GP - despite repeated requests from Red Bull. He overtook a furious Webber, won the race and the title in the end

"Later" turned out to be the pit stops, when Leclerc was brought in on lap 22 and given four laps on fresh tyres to close sufficiently on Vettel to get back into the lead when the German pitted.

A tight fight to the end appeared in store, with Vettel doubtless wanting to prove the point that he believed he was quicker, Leclerc feeling wronged, and Hamilton coming at them on fresher soft tyres.

Vettel's retirement threw all that out of the window - but the fall-out from the four-time champion's actions is likely to continue for some time.

Red Bull's Max Verstappen finished fourth, after starting ninth following a grid penalty for using too many engine parts, and his team-mate Alexander Albon fought up from a pit lane start following a crash in qualifying to take fifth, as McLaren's Carlos Sainz won the midfield fight in sixth place.

Driver of the day

The fans gave it to Vettel in F1's official vote, presumably influenced by his pace in the early laps. But this writer will have to duck judgement - the truncated race and safety cars means there are too many unanswered questions. Vettel - not for the first time in his career - adjudged himself too big to obey orders, and the ramifications of that could be huge. And a gripping end to the race, with Leclerc ahead of Vettel and Hamilton attacking the Ferraris, slipped away as a result of Vettel's retirement

What happens next?

The Japanese Grand Prix in two weeks' time, at magnificent Suzuka. With tensions at Ferrari clear, Hamilton closing on the title, and the finest stage in motor racing, it is a mouth-watering prospect.

"I say, old boy, is this the end of the race?" Leclerc's sixth career pole position on Saturday drew him level with other Scuderia legends - Juan Manuel Fangio (pictured) and Phil Hill

Togetherness? Or a lonely figure? Ferrari have some questions to answer