Murderer granted new appeal hearing after 35 years

Peter Sullivan was convicted of beating young barmaid Diane Sindall to death in a "frenzied sexual attack"

A Wirral man who has spent 35 years in prison for beating a woman to death has had his case referred back to the Court of Appeal due to new DNA evidence.

Peter Sullivan was convicted of murdering barmaid Diane Sindall in an alley after she left work at the Wellington Hotel in Bebington on 1 August 1986.

Police said 21-year-old Miss Sindall left her blue Fiat van on Borough Road, Birkenhead, after it ran out of petrol and had been walking to an all night garage when she was attacked.

The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) announced a DNA profile had been found on samples preserved at the time which did not match Sullivan.

Diane Sindall, 21, was due to be married when she was murdered

DNA technology was not available in criminal cases at the time of Ms Sindall's murder and earlier requests for testing had been refused, the commission said.

According to reports from the time, 29-year-old Sullivan, who was described by police as a "quiet loner", had spent the day drinking heavily after losing a darts match.

His trial heard how he happened across Miss Sindall and struck her with a crowbar before dragging her into the alley and sexually assaulting her during a "frenzied" attack.

The BBC reported at the time that some of the young bride-to-be's clothing was found partially burned on Bidston Hill the day after her death.

Detectives told journalists it was one of the worst murder cases they had worked on due to the extent of Miss Sindall's injuries.

Sullivan initially denied any involvement and provided an alibi, but according to reports later gave a "confession", telling detectives he could not remember why he had done it because he was so drunk.

His trial then heard bite marks on her body were a match for Sullivan's teeth.

Miss Sindall was dragged off Borough Road and attacked in this alley, where her partially clothed body was found 12 hours later

Questions have been raised about the veracity of bite mark evidence in criminal cases in recent years.

Sullivan applied to have his case re-examined in 2021, raising concerns about his police interviews, the bite mark evidence presented in his trial and the murder weapon, the commission said.

He claimed he had not been provided with an appropriate adult during the interview process and was initially denied legal representation.

Sullivan had previously applied to the CCRC in 2008, raising questions about DNA evidence, but forensic experts said that further testing was unlikely to reveal a DNA profile.

He had applied directly to the High Court for permission to appeal against his conviction in 2019 over the bite mark evidence, but this was rejected by the Court of Appeal on the basis that it was "not central to his conviction".

However the CCRC said it had now found evidence suggesting the bite-mark evidence was important.

When Mr Sullivan reapplied to have his case examined in 2021, the CCRC said it decided to revisit the possibility of DNA testing.

The Court of Appeal will now examine his case and has the power to quash his conviction if it deems it unsafe.