BBC Homepage
  • Skip to content
  • Accessibility Help
  • Your account
  • Notifications
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • iPlayer
  • Sounds
  • Bitesize
  • CBBC
  • CBeebies
  • Food
  • More menu
More menu
Search BBC
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • iPlayer
  • Sounds
  • Bitesize
  • CBBC
  • CBeebies
  • Food
Close menu
BBC News
Menu
  • Home
  • InDepth
  • Israel-Gaza war
  • War in Ukraine
  • Climate
  • UK
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Culture
More
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Health
  • Family & Education
  • In Pictures
  • Newsbeat
  • BBC Verify
  • Disability
  • BBC Trending

Instagram fact-check: Can a new flagging tool stop fake news?

  • Published
    14 September 2019
Share page
About sharing
File photo dated of the home page of social media site Instagram on a smartphone. Issue date: Wednesday July 31, 2019Image source, PA Media
Image caption,

A number of partners had recently asked Facebook to extend its fact-checking programme to Instagram

Shayan Sardarizadeh
BBC Monitoring

Facebook has launched a new feature allowing Instagram users to flag posts they think contain fake news to its fact-checking partners for verification. But questions remain as to whether it goes far enough to counter the amount of disinformation on the image-sharing platform.

The move is part of a wider raft of measures the social media giant has taken to tackle the problem of fake news on social media.

Facebook announced in May that it would start reducing the reach of false content, external on Instagram and gradually extend its fact-checking partnership to include the image-sharing platform. It also said it would start blocking hashtags and posts that spread anti-vaccine misinformation. Most recently, it tightened its political advertising rules ahead of next year's US presidential election.

Launched in December 2016, external following the controversy surrounding the impact of Russian meddling and online fake news in the US presidential election, Facebook's partnership now involves more than 50 independent fact-checkers in over 30 countries, external.

This X post cannot be displayed in your browser. Please enable Javascript or try a different browser.View original content on X
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.
Skip X post by Adam Mosseri

Allow X content?

This article contains content provided by X. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. You may want to read X’s cookie policy, external and privacy policy, external before accepting. To view this content choose ‘accept and continue’.

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.
End of X post by Adam Mosseri

The new flagging feature for Instagram users was first introduced in the US in mid-August and has now been rolled out globally.

Users can report potentially false posts by clicking or tapping on the three dots that appear in the top right-hand corner, selecting "report", "it's inappropriate" and then "false information".

Facebook provides fact-checkers with a dashboard of flagged posts. Fact-checkers can also check content of their own choosing. They use a rating system to determine whether it contains false or misleading information, external.

  • Meet the godfather of fake news

  • Is Facebook winning the fake news war?

  • The (almost) complete history of fake news

  • Instagram influencers: Have we stopped believing?

Media caption,

A brief history of fake news

The usual procedure on Facebook is that stories that are rated false, contain a mixture of accurate and inaccurate claims, or have false headlines will appear less prominent in users' news feeds. Accounts, pages and groups that repeatedly share misleading stories will be notified and face restrictions on distribution and their ability to make money from advertising.

Instagram's new flagging tool uses a similar dashboard and rating system. Posts rated as false by fact-checkers will be downgraded on its hashtag search and explore pages, external, two big methods people use to find new posts on the platform.

Facebook says that if a fact-checker rates a story as false on Facebook and it then appears on Instagram, an extra button can be clicked to rate it on there as well.

One notable difference is that an Instagram user whose content is reported and rated will not be notified, external.

Stephanie Otway, a spokeswoman for Instagram, said: "This is an initial step as we work toward a more comprehensive approach to tackling misinformation."

'Quite a lot of harm'

BBC News spoke with two fact-checking partners who welcomed the new feature and Facebook's track record in responding to feedback.

But they have concerns over the additional volume of work and ambiguity regarding the amount of impact it will have on reducing the spread of misinformation on the platform.

"Parts of the [Instagram] tool are less well-defined than the Facebook one. The amount of content that is sent to us is much smaller," says Aaron Sharockman, the executive director of PolitiFact, a US non-profit that has been using the tool.

PolitiFact recently debunked an Instagram hoax, external claiming 12 restaurant chains including McDonald's, KFC and Pizza Hut had come out in support of President Donald Trump's 2020 campaign.

Mr Sharockman says he had only been given access to 31 Instagram posts on the day of his phone interview with the BBC.

"They seem to have trouble finding out what constitutes misinformation. I am getting quite a lot of posts that I would not rate as false.

"I want to see more posts and be able to search within posts. Searching based on keywords is difficult on Instagram, especially if those words are in a photo or meme."

He says he wants to focus on "pure misinformation" relating to politics and the 2020 US election, and especially regarding posts seen by large numbers of people.

Silhouettes of mobile users are seen next to a screen projection of Instagram logo in this picture illustration taken March 28, 2018.Image source, Reuters
Image caption,

Fact-checkers have broadly welcomed the new feature but want more data on the impact of their work from Facebook

Will Moy, chief executive of Full Fact - a UK charity that joined the programme in January - says Facebook must be more transparent about the impact of their work and share more data with fact-checkers.

"It is very important that platforms help to educate people about misinformation and the risks that exist on the internet and social media," he says.

Full Fact published an assessment of the first six months of its partnership, external in June, calling on Facebook to expand its fact-checking programme to Instagram.

Mr Moy says misinformation about vaccination, 5G phone technology and toxins in food and drink are prevalent on Instagram.

"We have seen enough to know that health misinformation on Instagram is a real danger to people and can potentially cause quite a lot of harm."

  • How YouTube makes money from fake cancer cure videos

'Most effective platform'

Instagram boasts one billion monthly active users, external. Two reports for the US Senate Intelligence Committee in December about the extent of Russia's disinformation campaign in the 2016 election highlighted the platform for generating a high volume of engagement, external for misleading memes and images.

One report by the research firm New Knowledge, external said Instagram was "perhaps the most effective platform" for Russian troll farm the Internet Research Agency (IRA), adding: "Instagram engagement outperformed Facebook, which may indicate its strength as a tool in image-centric memetic (meme) warfare."

The other, by University of Oxford's Computational Propaganda Project and the social network analysis firm Graphika, external, said the IRA's activity on Instagram rose by 238% after the election. Many of the misleading memes specifically targeted African-American voters or centred on issues like gun rights.

Screenshot of a recent Instagram viral hoax fact-checked by PolitiFact from their websiteImage source, PolitiFact
Image caption,

PolitiFact has been using the new Instagram flagging feature since mid-August

Samantha Bradshaw, a researcher for the Computational Propaganda Project, says that viral images and videos are "the future of disinformation and fake news", making Instagram an ideal platform for such operations.

"No-one has time to read a long piece containing false information anymore. People want a brief, digestible and sometimes humorous image or video carrying a specific political message," she says.

Flagging tools for users are "positive steps in the right direction", she says, but do not address the root causes of online disinformation.

"Platforms should think deeply about the broader issues that cause false content to go viral, rather than content that is true. They need to address concerns regarding their algorithms and business models."

In an example of how misleading images can trick people, Madonna, external, Leonardo DiCaprio, external and Cristiano Ronaldo, external all recently posted what they assumed were images of fires in the Amazon on Instagram, generating over 14 million likes in total.

Although there is no doubt about the high number of fires in the rainforest this year, a reverse image search shows the photos were, in fact, taken in 1989, external, 2012, external and 2013, external respectively.

US Secretary of Energy Rick Perry and actor Rob Lowe both recently fell for a viral hoax claiming Instagram was about to change its privacy policy, external and make public photos that users had deleted.

'Human judgement'

Instagram hopes artificial intelligence will enable it to train algorithms to detect false content in the future, external, reducing the need for relying on fact-checking services and users.

But experts believe some level of human intervention will always be required to ensure the validity of the process.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks about protecting election integrity, fighting "fake news" and data privacy at Facebook Inc"s annual F8 developers conference in San Jose, California, U.S. May 1, 2018.Image source, Reuters
Image caption,

Mark Zuckerberg promised last year to "fix Facebook" amid criticism over fake news and the Cambridge Analytica scandal

"Ultimately, I expect that some aspects of identifying disinformation will be reliably covered by AI," says Ben Nimmo, head of investigations at Graphika. "But that means training enough analysts in the first instance to be able to create a large and reliable enough dataset, and then training the AI on the datasets and making sure it is up to the task, including by using human checks as a backstop."

Mr Moy says although AI will certainly help track the dissemination of fake news, it cannot "replace the human judgement in a way that respects the free speech of everyone involved."

"We could probably get to a place where algorithms and computers can spot fake news with a high degree of certainty," says Mr Sharockman. "But for people to believe it, we need humans to remain involved in the process."

BBC Monitoring reports and analyses news from TV, radio, web and print media around the world. You can follow BBC Monitoring on Twitter, external and Facebook, external.

What did you think of this story? Email and let us know, external

Follow BBC Trending on Twitter @BBCtrending, external, and find us on Facebook. All our stories are at bbc.com/trending.

More on this story

  • BBC and tech firms join forces to fight fake news

    • Published
      7 September 2019
    Mobile apps
  • 'Deepfake' app causes fraud and privacy fears in China

    • Published
      4 September 2019
    A still prom an online promotional video
  • Pinterest to push vaccine searches to health sites

    • Published
      29 August 2019
    A needle being injected into a girl's arm
  • Facebook tightens rules amid 2020 election fears

    • Published
      28 August 2019
    Facebook has updated its political advertising rules
  • 'Dangerous' AI offers to write fake news

    • Published
      27 August 2019
    A robot hand writing on a keyboard
  • YouTube shuts accounts over HK disinformation

    • Published
      22 August 2019
  • Fake news is 'reinforced by false memories'

    • Published
      22 August 2019
    Fake news

Top stories

  • Reform UK would pay countries for migrant return deals

    • Published
      11 minutes ago
  • Family 'heartbroken' over fatal helicopter crash

    • Published
      32 minutes ago
  • Live. 

    UN calls for justice after Israeli double strike on Gaza hospital as hostage families hold protests

    • 4791 viewing4.8k viewing

More to explore

  • 'When do we stop being immigrants?': Northern Ireland families ask after riots

    A man, Sree Kadalayil, is on the left and a woman, Jude Pollock, is on the right. They are sitting on an orange sofa that is placed up against a light green wall. Sree has short greying black hair and a black beard with specks of grey. He is wearing a blue jumper. Jude has shoulder-length reddish-blonde hair and is wearing a blue top with a flower pattern and an orange cardigan.
  • Who is Lisa Cook, and what is Federal Reserve governor accused of?

    File image of Lisa Cook
  • Sitting up straight isn't the only secret to good posture - here are three more tips

    Woman sitting at a chair holding her lower back and wincing in pain
  • 'Chelsea were angry to lose him' - who is Liverpool's Ngumoha?

    • Attribution
      Sport
    Rio Ngumoha celebrates scoring Liverpool's winner
  • South Korea's charm offensive and other takeaways from Trump meeting

    Lee Jae Myung and Trump sitting side by side in yellow armchairs in the Oval Office. They are wearing dark coloured suits with red ties. They're looking and smiling in the same direction.
  • 'Years of A1(M) roadworks have made village life hell'

    A man with white hair and a blue shirt looks at the camera. Behind him, two lorries are queueing on a roundabout. They are blurred.
  • Israeli double strike on Gaza hospital - what we know

    A man holds a microphone in one hand and a rucksack - both are covered in dust
  • 'How will I pay workers?': Indian factories hit hard by Trump's 50% tariffs

    A young woman, wearing a multi-coloured dress with a mask, intently working on a sewing machine at a factory in southern India.
  • Taiwan is preparing for a Chinese attack but its people don't think war is coming soon

    A treated montage image showing people walk past the Taipei 101 skyscraper building in Taipei, Taiwan and also an image of Taiwan military Patriot air defense system deployed at a park as part of the annual Han Kuang military exercises, in Taipei, Taiwan
loading elsewhere stories

Most read

  1. 1

    Family 'heartbroken' over fatal helicopter crash

  2. 2

    Reform UK would pay countries for migrant return deals

  3. 3

    Trump orders removal of Federal Reserve governor

  4. 4

    Meghan on who said 'I love you' first, and what she misses about UK

  5. 5

    Sitting up straight isn't the only secret to good posture - here are three more tips

  6. 6

    Schools, care homes and sports clubs sold off to pay spiralling council debt

  7. 7

    Manhunt under way after two police officers shot dead in rural Australian town

  8. 8

    Child sex abuse victim begs Elon Musk to remove links to her images

  9. 9

    Politician Hefin David found dead at home - inquest

  10. 10

    Domestic abuse screening tool doesn't work, minister says

BBC News Services

  • On your mobile
  • On smart speakers
  • Get news alerts
  • Contact BBC News

Best of the BBC

  • The world’s deadliest offshore disaster revisited

    • Attribution
      iPlayer
    Disaster at Sea: The Piper Alpha Story
  • The rise and fall of a British religious cult

    • Attribution
      Sounds
  • A sweeping historical drama with James Norton

    • Attribution
      iPlayer
    King and Conqueror
  • Ian Wright remembers his inspirational teacher

    • Attribution
      Sounds
    Desert Island Discs Postcards
  • Home
  • News
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • iPlayer
  • Sounds
  • Bitesize
  • CBBC
  • CBeebies
  • Food
  • Terms of Use
  • About the BBC
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Accessibility Help
  • Parental Guidance
  • Contact the BBC
  • Make an editorial complaint
  • BBC emails for you

Copyright © 2025 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.