Abused woman wins Supreme Court case against councilpublished at 13:59 British Summer Time 18 October 2017
Press Association
A woman who suffered physical and sexual abuse after being placed in foster care has won a battle against Nottinghamshire County Council in a "landmark" ruling at the Supreme Court.
Natasha Armes, from Nottingham, had previously lost actions at the High Court and the Court of Appeal in her claim that the council was liable for the abuse she suffered.
The issue the justices faced was whether the local authority who placed her into foster care could be held liable in respect of the abuse perpetrated by the foster carers - even though the council was not negligent in connection with the selection of supervision of them.
The justices ruled in favour of Ms Armes - who the court ruled could now be named - on Wednesday.
The court heard she was physically and emotionally abused by a "Mrs A" in the first placement, and sexually abused by a "Mr B" in the second.
The 40-year-old had been in foster care from the age of seven to 18.
The next stage of the litigation was for damages to be assessed.
Her lawyers have described it as a "landmark" ruling said it means claimants abused in foster care have been given clarity over "vicarious liability".
Colin Pettigrew, from Nottinghamshire County Council, said: "Ms Armes should have been safe in the care of her foster carers 30 years ago and she wasn't, this is a matter of huge regret to us.
"This Supreme Court determination will have far-reaching implications for us and every other local authority across the land which has children's social care responsibilities."