What did the jury have to decide?published at 16:56 Greenwich Mean Time 28 November 2019
In summing up the seven-week trial, Judge Sir Peter Openshaw ordered the jury to consider five questions. Only if they answered "Yes" to each question could they proceed to the next.
And they could only find Mr Duckenfield guilty of gross negligence manslaughter in the event of them answering Yes to each and every question.
Jurors were asked whether they "could be sure the defendant David Duckenfield owed a duty of care to the spectators attending the match?"
The court heard Benjamin Myers QC, defending Mr Duckenfield, accepted the now 75-year-old retired chief superintendent had owed a duty of care in law to the spectators attending the match to take reasonable care for their safety.