Upskirting bill passes second readingpublished at 17:46 British Summer Time 23 October 2018
Voyeurism (Offences) (No.2) Bill
House of Lords
Parliament
Bringing the debate to an end for the government, Lord Keen of Elie echoes Baroness Chakrabarti in urging for the bill to be "taken forward effectively and speedily, and that we therefore keep it within the compass that has been set by the terms of the bill."
"If we seek to go arms and legs on this legislation, I fear it may come to grief."
He tries to address concerns about the scope of the bill:
- On those taking images for financial gain, he says it is recognised that that would be for someone's sexual gratification, "there's no potential financial gain otherwise...we consider that area covered."
- If an image was shared for someone else's sexual gratification, he says that would also be covered on those grounds.
- On the distribution of an image by someone who did not take it, "that raises certain particular issues of its own", he lists a number of existing pieces of legislation that may cover it.
- He adds that the Law Commission has been asked to consider the wider concerns about the distribution of images on a wider basis, "this is not the bill in which we should attempt to address the wider issues of distribution."
- There would be anonymity for a victim if someone was prosecuted under the terms of the bill, he says.
- For those taking photos, "for a laugh", he says "it is perfectly clear that...that is bound to cause distress, and is therefore again covered."
The bill then progresses, without division, to committee, where it will receive greater scrutiny.