Transfers Q&A: Should United give youth a chance?published at 11:20 British Summer Time
Click 'Get involved' at the top of this page
Simon Stone
BBC Sport chief football news reporter

Chris Salmon: After Manchester United's disastrous handling of Alvaro Fernandez (now Carreras), should they prioritise handing promising youth talent some chances this year? Vitek, Obi, Shea, Fletcher etc could all make the step up. Or are the stakes now too high for Amorim?
There are a couple of strands to this, one of which I don't have the answer to. Firstly, I have no issue with loaning players out to help observe development and assess their likely impact in the future. Every leading Premier League club does that.
In addition, I have no issue with clubs selling young players they don't think are quite up to it and then subsequent questions being raised. I can offer loads of examples of that; Kevin de Bruyne (Chelsea), Cole Palmer and Morgan Rogers (Man City), Viktor Gyokeres (Brighton), Paul Pogba (Man Utd).
Those players left and flourished. No-one can know whether they would have reached the same levels if they had remained where they were.
My understanding is Erik ten Hag felt Carreras was not quick enough for the Premier League and struggled against quick players - and that he was more suited to a back-three defensive formation. There was no queue of Premier League clubs looking at him, which is how he ended up on loan, first at Grenada and then Benfica.
My question is why, given United spent the latter half of the 2023-24 season without a recognised left-back, they didn't bring him back to Old Trafford last summer, when Ten Hag concluded Harry Amass was not strong enough.
That would have seemed sensible from a business perspective, knowing Carreras' value had risen and with a half-decent season behind him, they would get a higher fee if they opted to sell at the end of the season. That would have seemed sensible to me.
Instead, they struggled through to January, when they spent £25m on Patrick Dorgu.