Why the pundits are wrong about Livipublished at 14:29 BST
Stuart Barrie
Fan writer

I can't get over the defeat against Hibernian. It was a sore one.
The scoreline looked emphatic and Hibs were the better team by a distance in the second half, but it's also fair to say we competed okay in the first.
At 2-0 down, if we had managed to get a goal then you never know how it would have finished.
That said, we didn't trouble the keeper enough and the Hibs subs added an extra threat we couldn't cope with, so 4-0 it was.
Our guys didn't have a howler, Hibs were just better on the day.
They'll beat bigger teams than us with that scoreline this season, I'd wager.
In the Championship, you could win a game even if you weren't in top gear. In the Premiership you need every player to be at least a seven or eight out of 10 to get anything.
I have to take exception to a few comments on Sportscene, which indicated that Livi were miles off it this season.
We took a hammering in this game but we've had points snatched from us by Rangers and Hearts with last-minute goals.
We've had creditable draws at Dundee United and Aberdeen as well as taking our customary three points from the pundits' favourite team, Falkirk.
Perhaps the points aren't on the board but the performances are decent and the manager has found a good way to approach games, where we can attack without leaving ourselves open.
Results over the weekend mean we are bottom of the league. No one wants to be there at any time but if we get a win against Motherwell, another team the pundits are falling over themselves to praise, then we go above them.
It's all to play for.