Transfer Q&A: Is there any reason why Newcastle would sell Isak?published at 15:10 BST 13 May
Image source, Getty ImagesBBC Sport senior football correspondent Sami Mokbel has been answering your questions on the upcoming transfer window.
Simon: Is there any reason Newcastle would sell Alexander Isak? £120m is a lot, but there's no known release clause, no appetite to sell to a rival in the Premier League, no readily available replacement, and over the next three years - if they do get three more Champions League campaigns - then the lack of a fee pays for itself surely?
Sami: The crux of the matter here is that Isak will have three years left on his contract at the end of the season. Therefore, Newcastle have virtually no jeopardy heading into the window with regards to selling Isak.
They will be able to demand more or less the same amount of money this summer than they will be able to next summer when the striker will have two years on his contract, particularly if the player continues to excel.
It is my information that Isak would be intrigued by the prospect of joining, say, Liverpool or Arsenal but there are absolutely no indications that the Swede would actively agitate a move.
So if there is any chance Isak goes, and I think those chances are remotely slim, it would be on Newcastle's terms - and they would be astronomical terms.
Their stance may be weakened slightly if they miss out on Champions League football this season but, even then, it's hard to see a scenario in which Isak goes.
Next summer, when Isak has two years left on his deal, would provide his suitors with a more realistic opportunity of luring him away from St James' Park.




























