The case against Maddisonpublished at 14:49 23 October
Lindsay: I am a great admirer of Maddison’s talent. However, I feel Spurs would be better suited playing with two defensively-minded midfielders - be that Yves Bissouma, Pape Sarr or Rodrigo Bentancur - to balance the propensity of the two full-backs bombing forward as wing-backs. That leaves one space for Maddison or Dejan Kulusevski. And the latter is on fire at the moment.
Will: Undoubtedly better without Maddison - just look at the second half last weekend. Spurs transformed when Maddison was substituted as usual. Was a great Leicester player but he hasn’t worked out at Spurs.
SB: Maddison is a valuable squad member who can be utilised in certain matches and situations. However, if we are to challenge for top honours as per the project target, we need a massive upgrade on him as a midfield playmaker. Too weak in the tackle and susceptible to losing possession easily.
Chris: Maddison negative, Dejan Kulusevski positive. What I mean is that Maddison will go down at the slightest touch, Dejan fights off physical challenges, and is therefore more inspiring for his teammates and the supporters who admire that fighting attitude. That's where leadership comes from, inspiring others around you.
Dave: Maddison needs to up his game. The first six months he was good but since the injury he's been bang average. Drop him to the bench for a bit and buy another attacking midfielder instead of betting on one horse as we also do.