What did Wolves say about VAR vote?published at 17:25 16 May
Premier League clubs will vote on the use of video assistant referees (VAR) in England's top flight in June, after Wolves formally submitted a resolution to the Premier League on Wednesday.
A club statement said the implementation of VAR in the Premier League at the start of the 2019-20 season "was a decision made in good faith and with the best interests of football and the Premier League at its heart" but added it has "led to numerous unintended negative consequences that are damaging the relationship between fans and football, and undermining the value of the Premier League brand".
It then listed nine of what it perceives to be "unintended negative consequences":
Impact on goal celebrations and the spontaneous passion that makes football special.
Frustration and confusion inside stadiums due to lengthy VAR checks and poor communication.
A more hostile atmosphere with protests, booing of the Premier League anthem and chants against VAR.
Overreach of VAR’s original purpose to correct clear and obvious mistakes, now overanalysing subjective decisions and compromising the game's fluidity and integrity.
Diminished accountability of on-field oXicials, due to safety net of VAR, leading to an erosion of authority on the pitch.
Continued errors despite VAR, with supporters unable to accept human error after multiple views and replays, damaging confidence in officiating standards.
Disruption of the Premier League's fast pace with lengthy VAR checks and more added time, causing matches to run excessively long.
Constant discourse about VAR decisions often overshadowing the match itself, and tarnishing the reputation of the league.
Erosion of trust and reputation, with VAR fuelling completely nonsensical allegations of corruption.
Wolves said there is "no blame to be placed" and that "all stakeholders have been working hard to try to make the introduction of additional technology a success", but it was "time for a constructive and critical debate" about the future of VAR after five seasons in operation.
The statement concluded: "Our position is that the price we are paying for a small increase in accuracy is at odds with the spirit of our game, and as a result we should remove it from the 2024-25 season onwards."