England's bowling conundrumpublished at 05:43 British Summer Time 24 October 2016
Jonathan Agnew
BBC Test Match Special
There's still Zafar Ansari in the squad - do they need to play three fast bowlers? Do they continue playing Rashid?
England win by 22 runs; lead series 1-0
Stokes (2-20) takes last two wickets
Ban 248 & 263 - Sabbir 64 not out
Batty 3-65, Broad 2-26, Moeen 2-60
Eng 293 & 240 - Stokes 85; Ban 248
Phil Dawkes
Jonathan Agnew
BBC Test Match Special
There's still Zafar Ansari in the squad - do they need to play three fast bowlers? Do they continue playing Rashid?
Ebony Rainford-Brent
Ex-England batter on Test Match Special
I think the new ball would have been quite easy for the batsmen to get away, a couple of blows and the game could have been over, so it was the right decision [not to take it]. He could have gone with Broad and Batty if he wanted a spinner at one end, but Stokes has been unbelievable with the old ball. I'd have been nervous bowling Rashid or Moeen Ali - the only options were Stokes, Batty and Broad.
Does that betray the fact that Cook might not be confident in Rashid and Moeen?
I think it does. What worries me is that they're skilful bowlers, but not quite as consistent - look at Mehedi, who Bangladesh gave the new ball to. He [Cook] didn't have confidence in them.
#bbccricket
Steve Clark: Clearly not playing a shot. Bat came down as an afterthought when he realised he had made an error.
Wesley Spearman: Need further proof Test matches should stay five days long?
dukkhaboy: Did England win because when it gets tight they are better? And as Bangladesh don't play nearly as many Tests as England do?
Jonathan Agnew
BBC Test Match Special
I think the third umpire starts with a clean slate so he has to decide whether Shafiul was playing a shot - and I didn't think he was. Was that bat seriously threatening to hit the ball? No. But I suspect there'll be some chuntering from Bangladesh.
Ebony Rainford-Brent
Ex-England batter on Test Match Special
What did you think after the last wicket?
He's technically not offering a shot, but you know the number 11 probably processes it a bit slower. The ball was tailing back, my gut feeling it was out and it was the right decision as there wasn't a clear intention to play a shot. How many different reviews have we had?
Allow Twitter content?
This article contains content provided by Twitter. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. You may want to read Twitter’s cookie policy, external and privacy policy, external before accepting. To view this content choose ‘accept and continue’.
Vic Marks
Ex-England spinner on BBC Radio 5 live sports extra
It's one of the best games I've seen for a long time. Radio Bangladesh have gone already! It might have been different if they'd won.
#bbccricket
Harry McCrea: Might have actually been good for Test cricket had Bangladesh won, but well fought England.
Matthew Mansfield: Nice and quick in the end. Great result and yet again another superb Test match. Why this form will always survive.
The argument over whether Shafiul was playing a shot or not will rumble on. The fact is, though, that England have won a fantastic game of cricket by 22 runs.
Cruel on Bangladesh as they were so, so close to their most famous Test win, but the tourists have dug deep and pulled a win out of the bag.
Vic Marks
Ex-England spinner on BBC Radio 5 live sports extra
He may have been trying to play a shot, but couldn't jam his bat down in time. He was half a second too late.
Jonathan Agnew
BBC Test Match Special
If he'd been playing a shot, he wouldn't have been out.
Vic Marks
Ex-England spinner on BBC Radio 5 live sports extra
If he's been hit outside the line but is deemed to be playing a shot, who decides that? The third umpire.
Shafiul lbw Stokes 0 (Ban 263)
He's out! It's over! England have won! The ball is shown to be clipping off to give us umpire's call. There is some controversy, though. Was he playing a shot or not? If he was then the fact he was hot outside the line saves him. Clearly, the umpires believe no shot was being played.
Ban 263-9
Oh lets end this on a review shall we?! Stokes traps Shafiul on the pad playing a very nervous forward prod. The bat is nowhere in the equation.
Vic Marks
Ex-England spinner on BBC Radio 5 live sports extra
I bet you England wouldn't have reviewed that if we hadn't gone past the 80-over mark as they wouldn't have two left. What confused us, and would have given Bangladesh some optimism, was the manner of the shot Taijul played as he went a long way over to the off side.
A critical moment of the match. Shafiul, let's not forget, has a Test half-century.
Taijul lbw Stokes 16 (Ban 263-9)
It's out! The review system was always going to play a big role in this finale. The 25th time we have gone upstairs results in another over-turn as the ball is shown to be hitting then middle of leg stump. Sabbir is on his knees, forehead resting on his bat. England are bouncing.
Ban 263-8
Big appeal. England want lbw against Taijul. The ball has gone down to fine leg and they have run two. My instinct is that it is going down, but the reviews have been refreshed and England are desperate so why not have a look?
Jonathan Agnew
BBC Test Match Special
I know we've only had three overs, but it's not doing much for the seamers.
23 runs required
Taijul's technique is not pretty but it is proving effective. He is doing a cracking job so far. He flicks the ball off his legs to pick up another single and keep the strike for what you assume will be Stokes again.
24 runs required
England are still happy to let Sabbir have a single. He taps Broad into the off side and sprints through.