Paying top dollar - but is it for top quality?published at 09:25 GMT 12 March
Pat Nevin
Former footballer and presenter

The reality for Manchester City is that they have lost great players to the ravages of time and their efforts to replace them seem less inspired than days gone by.
Other than Erling Haaland, who was a blindingly obvious acquisition that every football fan on the planet knew about, and maybe Phil Foden who was not bought, the players coming in lately have tended to be good or even very good, but not necessarily great.
The spending of nearly £200m in January should have given them an uplift, but it has been marginal at best. Compare that with the improvement at Aston Villa, in January they traded Jhon Duran out for £50m and acquired Marco Asensio (loan), Marcus Rashford (loan) and Donyell Malen (£21m), to find themselves immediately stronger and also in profit.
City are clearly buying for the long term, but can they match their previous ability to get excellent value for money. Kevin de Bruyne cost £55m for 10 years of brilliance. That's a measly £5.5m per season! David Silva at £43m also lasted 10 years, so £4.3m per season for that little genius. A long list of others were also cheap at the price considering their successful years.
Do we think that Jack Grealish (£100m) will be considered the same great value when he finally leaves? Will the likes of the youthful Omar Marmoush, Nico Gonzalez and Savinho (two goals in 37 games so far), eventually be as good value, deliver as many trophies, dominate the game and show that they are as rounded players as their illustrious predecessors? It is a big ask.
You never know, that slippage from the acquisitions team might recover, but the problem is that others have caught up and City can no longer blow everyone out of the water financially due to PSR.
Sign up to read more from Pat Nevin in his Football Extra newsletter