Ineos' Ten Hag dilemma could 'boil down to financials'published at 12:24 1 October
Alex Turk
Fan writer
Manchester United may have shown glimpses of improvement in some areas in the early stages of the season, but football is a results business, especially in M16.
And there is only so much that even the most patient of fans - a reputation I try my best to uphold, at least publicly - can accept.
Back-to-back 3-0 league defeats at home is the definition of unacceptable. I could repeat the stronger adjectives I used on Sunday, but that is the part I will keep private.
The official word is Ineos remains supportive of Erik ten Hag, who is expected to oversee this week's daunting trips to Porto and Aston Villa.
That goes against the intensifying cries for change coming from an increasing number of fans tired of watching their team falter and fall while rivals triumph and thrive.
Yet there is a key element many are forgetting, and it could be the core reason why Ten Hag was offered a third season in the dugout when Ineos was unconvinced in the first place.
It boils down to financials. United recently made about 250 employees redundant as part of a ruthless cost-cutting process overseen by Sir Jim Ratcliffe.
The club faced paying about £10m to terminate the final year of Ten Hag's contract in the summer. Now, after the decision to trigger the extension in his deal as a show of faith, he has 21 months left.
Ineos can ill afford many more hiccups so early in what has been advertised as the start of a new era at United.
Splashing what would now be as much as £18m to sack a manager months after backing him with another £200m in the transfer market would not be a good look.
However, letting such glaring mediocrity continue could prove even more costly.
It is a dilemma the next two matches will help answer.
Find more from Alex Turk at Stretford Paddock, external