'United pay his wages so he should keep fit to play for United'published at 12:35 16 August
We asked for your views on Manchester United legend Peter Schmeichel saying Luke Shaw "should be focusing on and prioritising" his club over playing for England, following the left-back's latest injury setback.
Here are some of your comments:
Kelly: Absolutely right! Manchester United pay his wages, so he should keep fit to play for United. I get that playing for your country means a lot but, without playing for your club, how can one justify wearing the England shirt? Also, he is depriving others who consistently did well for their club but are still being overlooked for their country. Where is the logic?
Essien: Manchester United should focus on getting rid of Luke Shaw. It makes no sense keeping and paying a player who is only available for the treatment table and not on the pitch. United did a similar thing with Phil Jones - they kept him and renewed his contracts when he never played.
Dave: Schmeichel is so right. The club pays the player's massive wages to turn out for the side. It is no good them sitting on the sidelines, picking up big bucks and not playing. This is the bread and butter, not England games (particularly friendlies). If you aren't available for selection for the club, you shouldn't be playing for your country.
Rob: Manchester United can't have players that are only available for less than 50% of the time, especially as he deemed himself fit enough to play for England in the Euros. He is another example of a player the club has held on to for far too long to "preserve his value". If Manchester United are to rebuild, then players with Luke Shaw's injury record should be out of the door.
Billy: It is any player's dream to play in the Euros and he performed brilliantly in the final, so I don't see the problem.