Analysis: 'Flawed' probe into Army abuse claimspublished at 17:27 Greenwich Mean Time 19 March 2018
Jonathan Beale
BBC Defence Correspondent
On the face of it, these were very serious allegations of widespread physical abuse of teenage recruits - children in the eyes of the law - but the court martial quickly unravelled.
The Judge Advocate was scathing about the way the Royal Military Police (RMP) handled the investigation. There were long delays in taking statements and evidence was lost or ignored.
Some of the teenage recruits had "no, or at very best vague, recollections" of the events and key witnesses, including Army instructors, weren't even spoken to.
Judge Alan Large concluded the RMP had carried out the case "in direct breach of their duty to investigate fairly and objectively".
This isn't the first time the RMP has been accused of bungling an investigation.
The human rights group Liberty said it should be a "wake-up call" for the Ministry of Defence and should force a rethink about the armed forces' system of justice.