Why did Leicester win their PSR case and can the Premier League appeal?published at 10:33 5 September
Dan Roan, Simon Stone and Tom Mallows
BBC Sport
Leicester were charged for allegedly breaching Rule E.49 of the Premier League PSR regulations because their three-year rolling losses of £129.4m, up to the end of the 2022-23 season, were over the allowed threshold of £105m.
Following their relegation from the Premier League in May the Foxes officially ceased to be a top-flight side when they transferred their share to Luton in mid-June 2023.
Leicester successfully argued that because their 2022-23 accounting period ended on 30 June, they were not longer bound by Premier League rules and so could not be found in breach.
The Foxes had earlier changed the end of their accounting period from 30 May to 30 June, though the commission said there was not "anything untoward" with the move and it complied with accounting rules.
Technically, the Premier League could appeal, but it is unlikely because the bar is so high on what they need to prove.
The issue is with the wording of the Premier League’s own rules rather than the validity of the judgement.
It has created a situation where relegated clubs are no longer part of the Premier League if their three-year accounting period ends on 30 June. The ruling says because of that, the Premier League has no authority to charge clubs because they are not members.
The league could re-write the rules to make them tighter and less ambiguous, avoiding a similar situation in the future.